Passage
John 5.23
Book: John · ASV / WEB / KJV / YLT
Verse
Sponsored
ASV:
"23. that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He that honoreth not the Son honoreth not the Father that sent him." (John 5:23, ASV)
WEB:
"23. that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He who doesn't honor the Son doesn't honor the Father who sent him." (John 5:23, WEB)
KJV:
"23. That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him." (John 5:23, KJV)
YLT:
"23. that all may honour the Son according as they honour the Father; he who is not honouring the Son, doth not honour the Father who sent him." (John 5:23, YLT)
Immediate context (±2 verses)
ASV:
"21. For as the Father raiseth the dead and giveth them life, even so the Son also giveth life to whom he will. 22. For neither doth the Father judge any man, but he hath given all judgment unto the Son; 23. that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He that honoreth not the Son honoreth not the Father that sent him. 24. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth him that sent me, hath eternal life, and cometh not into judgment, but hath passed out of death into life. 25. Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour cometh, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and they that hear shall live." (John 5:21-25, ASV)
WEB:
"21. For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son also gives life to whom he desires. 22. For the Father judges no one, but he has given all judgment to the Son, 23. that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He who doesn't honor the Son doesn't honor the Father who sent him. 24. "Most certainly I tell you, he who hears my word, and believes him who sent me, has eternal life, and doesn't come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. 25. Most certainly, I tell you, the hour comes, and now is, when the dead will hear the Son of God's voice; and those who hear will live." (John 5:21-25, WEB)
KJV:
"21. For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. 22. For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: 23. That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. 24. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. 25. Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live." (John 5:21-25, KJV)
YLT:
"21. 'For, as the Father doth raise the dead, and doth make alive, so also the Son doth make alive whom he willeth; 22. for neither doth the Father judge any one, but all the judgment He hath given to the Son, 23. that all may honour the Son according as they honour the Father; he who is not honouring the Son, doth not honour the Father who sent him. 24. 'Verily, verily, I say to you, He who is hearing my word, and is believing Him who sent me, hath life age-during, and to judgment he doth not come, but hath passed out of the death to the life. 25. 'Verily, verily, I say to you, There cometh an hour, and it now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and those having heard shall live;" (John 5:21-25, YLT)
Setting
- Speaker: Jesus (direct discourse), His longest sustained Christological-self-disclosure speech in the Gospels (John 5:19-47)
- Audience: Jewish leaders (hoi Ioudaioi, likely Pharisees and temple authorities) who had just sought to kill Jesus for healing on the Sabbath and "making himself equal with God" (v. 18)
- Location: Jerusalem, by the pool of Bethesda (where the Sabbath-controversy healing of 5:1-15 had just occurred), or more broadly the temple precincts where Jesus's defense-discourse unfolded
- Time period: events c. AD 28 (one of "the feasts of the Jews", likely Passover or Sabbath-controversy season, per John 5:1); composed c. AD 85-95 by John the Apostle (Ephesus)
- Narrative context: Jesus had just healed a paralytic on the Sabbath (5:1-15), then was confronted by Jewish leaders for breaking the Sabbath (5:16). His response, "My Father worketh hitherto, and I work" (5:17), was understood by the leaders as a divinity-claim: "the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God" (5:18). John 5:19-47 is Jesus's sustained response to this charge. The structure of vv. 19-29: Jesus IS one with the Father in (a) work (vv. 19-20), (b) life-giving (v. 21), (c) judgment (v. 22), (d) honor / worship (v. 23), (e) eschatological-life-giving (vv. 24-25), (f) resurrection-summoning (vv. 28-29). Verse 23 is the climactic honor / worship claim in this Christological cascade.
Theological reading
John 5:23 is one of the clearest worship-of-Jesus mandates in the New Testament, framed as Jesus's own direct claim. The structure is logically tight: the Father has committed all judgment to the Son (v. 22) for the explicit purpose (Greek hina, v. 23) that all may honor the Son kathōs (just as / according as) they honor the Father. The honor due the Father is divine honor (worship); the honor due the Son is the same divine honor; therefore the Son is divine and the proper object of worship.
The grammatical force, kathōs equality
The conjunction kathōs (καθώς) is the Greek particle of equality / sameness. It means "in the same way as / to the same extent as." When Jesus says all should honor the Son kathōs they honor the Father, He is not saying "honor the Son like you honor the Father with some lesser honor." He is saying the honor is of the same kind and degree, divine worship.
Compare:
- John 17:18, "As (kathōs) thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world", same kind of sending, not lesser
- John 17:21, "that they all may be one; as (kathōs) thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee", same kind of unity, not lesser
- John 20:21, "as (kathōs) my Father hath sent me, even so send I you", same kind of sending
The kathōs construction asserts identity-of-kind, not analogy-of-quality. Jesus is claiming divine worship, not merely high human esteem.
The negative half, refusing to honor the Son refuses the Father
The second sentence is the converse: "He that honoreth not the Son honoreth not the Father that sent him." The logical force is:
- "To honor the Father correctly entails honoring the Son with the same honor"
- Therefore: "any framework that honors only the Father while denying divine honor to the Son does not in fact honor the Father at all"
This is the direct doctrinal foreclosure of:
- Unitarian-Jewish Christology (Jesus is not God; we worship only the Father)
- Islamic Christology (Jesus is a prophet, not God; worship the Father only)
- Jehovah's Witness Christology (Jesus is a created being; worship the Father only)
- Modern Unitarian-Universalist positions (Jesus is a great teacher; worship the divine in general)
On Jesus's own claim, all four of these positions do not honor the Father at all. The verse is the principal Christian counter to every honor-only-the-Father religious framework.
Patristic reading
Athanasius (Discourses Against the Arians, c. AD 358) deploys John 5:23 as one of the principal anti-Arian texts: if the Son is created (Arian position), He cannot be honored as the Father is honored, but Jesus commands exactly that equal honor, so the Son must be uncreated and fully divine. This is the patristic foundation of the Nicene reading.
Augustine (Tractates on the Gospel of John 19, c. AD 416): "the Son is to be honored even as the Father, the equality being thus shown in the very mode of honoring." The honor's equality establishes the natures' equality.
Cyril of Alexandria (5th c.) connects this verse to the Christological controversies of his day: the Son to whom equal-honor-with-the-Father is due is the same Son who became incarnate; the hypostatic union (Hypostatic Union) is presupposed by the worship-mandate.
Reformed reading
John Calvin (Commentary on John ad loc.) reads the verse as the doctrinal foundation for the worship-of-Christ as the second person of the Trinity: "He that honoureth not the Son... declares plainly that he does not honour the Father at all... For the proper honour of the Father consists in this, to acknowledge the Son."
The Heidelberg Catechism Q. 33 ("Why is Christ called God's only-begotten Son?") and Westminster Larger Catechism Q. 36-37 cite John 5:23 as proof of the eternal divinity of the Son worthy of equal worship.
Apologetic deployment
The verse anchors three apologetic moves:
-
Against Islam (see Islamic Dilemma): Islam claims to honor God supremely while denying divine honor to Jesus. On Jesus's own claim (5:23b), this entire framework "honors not the Father." The Islamic-Jewish honor-the-one-God-without-Christ claim is foreclosed by the very Christ whose authority Islam acknowledges as prophetic (Surah 4:171 calls Jesus "a messenger of Allah, and His Word", making this verse's force inescapable on Muslim premises).
-
Against Jehovah's Witnesses (and adjacent Arian positions, see Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism §Arianism): the JW position that Jesus is the highest created being but not properly God-to-be-worshipped fails the kathōs test of 5:23. Either the worship-equality is real (JW position collapses) or Jesus is lying (rejection of biblical-authority).
-
Against the secular-humanist Jesus (Bart Ehrman / Reza Aslan / John Dominic Crossan-style readings, Jesus as great moral teacher but not divine): the kathōs worship-mandate is in Jesus's own mouth on a critical-scholarly-accepted apostolic-reception text. The merely-human-Jesus reading either treats this verse as later church-fabrication (which Ehrman does, dating John late and treating high Christology as developmental) or accepts the verse's force (collapsing the merely-human reading). The early-high-Christology scholarship (Hurtado, Bauckham, Wright) defends the apostolic origin of this and similar high-Christological texts.
The Oneness Pentecostal reading
In ris3n's Oneness Pentecostal framework, John 5:23 is fully embraced: Jesus (the one God incarnate as Son) is to be honored with the same divine honor as the Father, because Jesus is the one God in His Son-manifestation. The Trinitarian and Oneness readings both fully affirm the worship-of-Christ mandate; they differ on whether the worship is directed to a distinct second Person (Trinitarian) or to the one God's incarnational manifestation (Oneness). See Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism.
Canonical-theological connections
- John 5:18, "making himself equal with God", the immediate prior charge Jesus is responding to (and not denying, confirming)
- John 5:21-22, life-giving + judgment-authority (the prerogatives the worship-due-Son uniquely possesses)
- John 1:1, 18, Logos as God; only-begotten God
- John 8:58, "before Abraham was, I AM"
- John 10:30, "I and my Father are one"
- John 14:9, "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father"
- John 17:5, "the glory which I had with thee before the world was" (eternal pre-existence)
- John 20:28, Thomas's confession (the apostolic response to the worship-mandate)
- Philippians 2:9-11, "every knee should bow... every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord", the eschatological universal worship of Christ
- Revelation 5:13-14, heavenly worship of the Lamb on the throne with the Father
- Hebrews 1:6, "let all the angels of God worship him" (Psalm 97:7 applied to the Son)
- Matthew 28:17, the disciples worship the risen Jesus (Greek prosekynēsan)
- Matthew 14:33, the disciples worship Jesus after the water-walking (prosekynēsan)
Key words
- G3962 - pater, patēr, "Father" (Strong's G3962)
- G5207 - huios, huios, "Son" (Strong's G5207), the central Christological title in this passage
- G3956 - pas, pas, "all" (Strong's G3956), the universal scope of the worship-mandate
- timaō (τιμάω, Strong's G5091), "to honor / value / esteem", the verb used twice in this verse; build candidate for lexicon
See also
Direct doctrinal hubs
- Christs Deity, the case for Jesus's full divinity (this verse is a principal proof-text on worship-due)
- Christology, broader category
- Trinity, the doctrinal framework for the Father-Son co-honor
- Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism, multi-position dispute
- Logos Christology, Johannine framework
- Hypostatic Union, presupposed Christological structure
- Jesus, the speaker
Companion deity-of-Christ passages
- John 1:1 (rich hub at John 1.1-14), Logos = God
- John 8:58, I AM
- John 10:30, I and the Father are one
- John 14:9, seeing me = seeing the Father
- John 20:28 (rich hub), Thomas's confession
- Philippians 2:9-11, universal worship of Christ
- Revelation 5:13-14, heavenly worship of the Lamb
- Hebrews 1:6, 8, angels-worship of the Son
Apologetic deployment
- Islamic Dilemma, the verse forecloses honor-the-Father-without-honoring-the-Son frameworks
- Conversation Scenarios, §6 (Jehovah's Witnesses); §7 (Muslim) deploy this verse
- Quick Objection Responses, A-cluster + Christological-deity objections
People who developed the reading
- Athanasius, patristic anti-Arian deployment
- Augustine, patristic-Western worship-equality reading
- Cyril of Alexandria, Christological-hypostatic reading
- John Calvin, Reformed worship-of-Christ deployment
- Larry Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ (2003), the empirical worship-of-Jesus historical case
- Richard Bauckham, early-high-Christology defender