Passage
Matthew 5.48
Book: Matthew · NASB95
Verse
Sponsored
"Therefore you are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." (Matthew 5:48, NASB95)
Immediate context (±2 verses)
NASB95 (NASB95)
"For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same?"
"Therefore you are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." (Matthew 5:46-48, NASB95)
Setting
- Speaker: Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount.
- Audience: the disciples primarily ("seeing the crowds, He went up the mountain, and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him… He opened His mouth and began to teach them," Matthew 5:1-2); the broader crowds within earshot.
- Location: "the mountain", traditionally identified with the Mount of Beatitudes near Capernaum, on the northwest shore of the Sea of Galilee.
- Time period: early in Jesus's Galilean ministry, c. AD 28.
Theological reading
The verse closes the antithesis-section of the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:21-48, "you have heard… but I say to you" series) with a sweeping summative imperative. Three claims compressed into ten Greek words:
- The imperative. Esesthe oun hymeis teleioi, "you shall be teleios" (future indicative used as imperative). The command is binding on disciples.
- The standard. Hōs ho patēr hymōn ho ouranios teleios estin, "as your heavenly Father is teleios." The yardstick is God's own character. Not human standards, not the Pharisees' standards, not even Moses's standards, God's.
- The connection. Oun, "therefore." The verse is a conclusion drawn from vv. 43-47's love-of-enemies command. The teleios commanded is specifically the perfection of all-encompassing love, love that includes enemies, parallel to God's love that gives sun and rain to "the evil and the good" (v. 45).
The context controls the meaning. Teleios here is not "sinless flawlessness" abstractly; it is completeness in love, refusing to limit love to the loveable, mirroring God's indiscriminate-good-giving to creatures.
What kind of perfection?
The verse generates one of the most-debated theological questions: what level of perfection is commanded, and to what degree is it achievable? See G5046 - teleios for the full lexical case.
Three readings:
- Sinless perfectionism (some Wesleyan-holiness traditions), Jesus literally commands sinlessness; the command is achievable in this life through Christian-perfection grace. Defended by appeal to "be perfect" as imperative.
- Wesleyan "Christian perfection" / perfect love (John Wesley, A Plain Account of Christian Perfection, 1766), perfection is love perfected / a heart wholly given to God in love. Not sinless flawlessness but a whole-hearted devotion. Wesley's careful definition: an attitude of perfect love that excludes "willful sin" but acknowledges ongoing weakness, ignorance, and unwitting failure.
- Reformed: aspirational / direction, the verse commands the direction of the Christian life (full conformity to God's character) without claiming this is achievable in this life. Sanctification is real but progressive; perfection awaits glorification (1 John 3:2; Philippians 3:12, Paul: "not that I have already obtained… or have already become teleios").
The Reformed reading is dominant in evangelical scholarship. Calvin (Harmony of the Gospels, ad loc.): "[the verse] does not so much command us to be perfect as it shows us what perfection is, by directing us to the example of God." J. I. Packer (Knowing God; Concise Theology) maintains that progressive sanctification, not achieved perfection, is the Christian's life.
Connection to OT, Leviticus 19:2 / 11:44
The verse echoes the Holiness Code:
- Leviticus 11:44, "consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy"
- Leviticus 19:2, "you shall be holy, for I, the LORD your God, am holy"
- 1 Peter 1:15-16, Peter directly cites Leviticus 19:2 with similar imperative force
The pattern: God's character is the moral standard for His people. The Levitical "be holy" and Matthew's "be perfect" are parallel, both ground Christian ethics in God's nature, not in cultural conventions or human achievement.
The Lukan parallel is illuminating: Luke 6:36 has ginesthe oiktirmones, "be merciful, as your Father is merciful." Where Matthew has teleios, Luke has oiktirmōn (merciful). The two terms are not synonymous but they specify the teleios commanded: it is love-perfection / mercy-perfection. Luke's text is essentially Matthew's interpretation: the teleios commanded is mercy extended even to enemies.
Apologetic significance
The verse anchors:
- Christian ethics grounded in God's character, not human convention. Modern moral relativism is countered by the appeal to a transcendent standard.
- The Christ-Pharisee contrast, the Pharisees' merit-based righteousness is set against the teleios standard, which is unattainable by works but attainable by participation in God's character through grace. The verse, in context, exposes the inadequacy of all merit-based righteousness, driving the hearer to the gospel.
- The need for atoning grace, if the standard is "be perfect as God is perfect," then no human meets the standard. Romans 3:23's universal sin makes the verse a diagnostic: every human falls short of teleios. Salvation must be by grace, not by approximating the standard.
- Apologetic against works-righteousness religions (Mormonism, JW, certain Catholic readings), the impossibly high standard pushes toward grace-based soteriology.
Patristic. Augustine (Sermon on the Mount I, c. AD 393) reads the verse as both standard-setting and grace-driving: God commands what we cannot achieve apart from grace, then gives us grace to pursue what He commands. Chrysostom (Homilies on Matthew 18) develops the love-perfection reading: the teleios in context is the perfection of love-of-enemies that mirrors the Father.
Reformed. Calvin (Harmony); B. B. Warfield (Studies in Perfectionism, 1932); Sinclair Ferguson (The Whole Christ, 2016), sanctification as progressive direction toward teleios glory; not achievable in this life but real and pursued.
Wesleyan. John Wesley (A Plain Account of Christian Perfection, 1766); Phoebe Palmer (The Way of Holiness, 1843), the Christian-perfection / entire-sanctification doctrine. Modern evangelical-Holiness movements maintain this reading with varying emphases.
Key words
- G5046 - teleios, teleios (perfect / complete / mature), the central concept
- G3962 - pater, patēr (Father), the standard-setter
- G0026 - agape, agapē (love), implicit in the love-of-enemies context
Connection to other passages
- Luke 6:36, parallel saying with oiktirmōn (merciful) for teleios
- Leviticus 19:2 / 11:44, OT parallel "be holy, for I am holy"
- 1 Peter 1:15-16, NT citation of Lev 19:2
- Romans 3.23, universal falling-short
- Ephesians 2.8-9, grace-not-works as the response
Quoted in
- 1 Corinthians 10.1-4
- 1 Corinthians 13
- 1 John 2.1
- 1 John 3.1
- 1 John 4.18
- 1 Peter 1.1-2
- 1 Peter 1.3
- 2 Corinthians 1.3-4
- Acts 1
- Acts 1.4
- Acts 1.7-8
- Acts 15.10
- Acts 2.33
- Acts 3.13-16
- Acts 3.22
- Acts 7.51
- Atheist Moral Realism Defeater
- Colossians 3.17
- Ephesians 1.17
- Ephesians 2.18
- Ephesians 4.5-6
- Ephesians 4.6
- Ephesians 6
- Fourth Way - Degrees of Perfection
- G5046 - teleios
- Galatians 4.6
- Hebrews 1
- Hebrews 1.1
- Hebrews 1.1-14
- Hebrews 1.1-2
- Hebrews 5.12-14
- James 1.2-4
- James 3.2
- John 1.1-14
- John 1.1-18
- John 10.14-15
- John 10.14-16
- John 10.14-18
- John 10.15
- John 10.17-18
- John 10.27-30
- John 10.28-29
- John 10.30-33
- John 10.31-33
- John 10.32
- John 10.34-36
- John 10.36
- John 10.36-38
- John 10.37-38
- John 10.38
- John 11
- John 11.41
- John 12.26
- John 12.27
- John 12.50
- John 14.1-7
- John 14.10
- John 14.12-14
- John 14.13-14
- John 14.23
- John 14.31
- John 14.6-7
- John 14.7-10
- John 14.8
- John 14.8-9
- John 14.9-11
- John 15.26
- John 15.9
- John 16.16-17
- John 16.23
- John 16.27-28
- John 16.28
- John 16.3
- John 16.32
- John 16.5-15
- John 17.1
- John 17.18-22
- John 17.21-22
- John 17.21-23
- John 17.4-5
- John 2.13-17
- John 20.17
- John 20.17-18
- John 20.21
- John 3
- John 3.35
- John 4.23
- John 5
- John 5.17
- John 5.19
- John 5.19-20
- John 5.21-22
- John 5.22
- John 5.22-23
- John 5.24-27
- John 5.26
- John 5.30
- John 5.36-37
- John 5.37
- John 5.43
- John 5.45
- John 6.37
- John 6.39
- John 6.39-40
- John 6.46
- John 6.49
- John 6.57
- John 7.53-8
- John 8.14-19
- John 8.16
- John 8.16-18
- John 8.18
- John 8.18-24
- John 8.19
- John 8.23-29
- John 8.27
- John 8.28
- John 8.29
- John 8.56
- Jude 1
- log
- Luke 1.29-38
- Luke 1.32
- Luke 10.22
- Luke 14.26-27
- Luke 15.11-32
- Luke 16.19-31
- Luke 22.41-44
- Luke 22.42
- Luke 23.46
- Luke 6.17-49
- Luke 6.24-26
- Luke 6.27-2
- Mark 13.32
- Mark 15
- Mark 9.21
- Matthew 10.37-39
- Matthew 16.27
- Matthew 18.10
- Matthew 18.23-35
- Matthew 18.34-35
- Matthew 19
- Matthew 19.16-19
- Matthew 19.16-30
- Matthew 26.37-40
- Matthew 26.39
- Matthew 26.42
- Matthew 28.18-19
- Matthew 28.19-20
- Matthew 6.25-26
- Matthew 6.25-34
- Matthew 7.21
- Perfection Argument
- Philippians 2
- Philippians 2.11
- Philippians 2.8-11
- Quick-Glance Reference Guide to Aquinas Five Ways (ris3n)
- Revelation 1.5-6
- Romans 12
- Romans 12.2
- Romans 4.1
- Romans 4.17
- Romans 6.3-4
- Romans 8
- Romans 8.15
- Theism vs Atheism on Suffering
- Titus 1.4
Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB), Copyright © 1960, 1971, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org