Passage
Matthew 20.25-28
Book: Matthew · NASB95
Verse
Sponsored
"But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. It is not this way among you, but whoever wishes to become great among you shall be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave; just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.'" (Matthew 20:25-28, NASB95)
Immediate context (±2 verses)
NASB95 (NASB95)
"23. He said to them, 'My cup you shall drink; but to sit on My right and on My left, this is not Mine to give, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by My Father.' 24. And hearing this, the ten became indignant with the two brothers."
"25. But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. 26. It is not this way among you, but whoever wishes to become great among you shall be your servant, 27. and whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave; 28. just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.'"
"29. As they were leaving Jericho, a large crowd followed Him. 30. And two blind men sitting by the road, hearing that Jesus was passing by, cried out, 'Lord, have mercy on us, Son of David!'" (Matthew 20:23-30, NASB95)
Setting
- Speaker: Jesus, instructing the Twelve.
- Audience: the disciples, specifically responding to the request of Salome (mother of James and John) and the resulting indignation of the other ten. The teaching addresses the perennial impulse to seek prestige and rank within the messianic community.
- Location: on the road to Jerusalem, near Jericho, Matthew places this immediately before the entry into Jerusalem (Matt 21).
- Time period: the final week before the crucifixion, c. AD 30. The teaching is paralleled in Mark 10:42-45 and (somewhat reorganized) in Luke 22:24-27 (set at the Last Supper).
Theological reading
The passage holds together two of the most consequential teachings of Jesus on ecclesiology and atonement: the anti-domination ethic of Christian community (vv. 25-27) and the ransom-saying (v. 28), one of the clearest atonement-theology statements in the Synoptic tradition.
1. The contrast, Gentile rule vs Christian community. "The rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them." The verbs are katakyrieuousin and katexousiazousin, both compound forms with the kata- prefix that intensifies to "lord it over" and "exercise authority over" with the connotation of domination, oppression. Jesus describes the standard pattern of political-religious power in the ancient world: hierarchy enforced through coercion, the great extracting service from the lesser.
"It is not this way among you" (ouch houtōs estin en hymin), the contrast is sharp. Christian community is structurally different: greatness is service, not domination; status is inverted; the first becomes last by becoming servant of all.
2. Diakonos / doulos, servant / slave. Jesus uses both terms intensifying the point:
- Diakonos (servant, attendant), the ordinary household servant
- Doulos (bondservant, slave), the more total category of belonging to a master
Greatness in Christ's community is diakonos-status; first-place is doulos-status. The structural inversion of normal social order is total.
3. The implications for ecclesiology. The teaching is foundational for Christian servant-leadership, the entire NT pattern of leadership is read through this Christological norm. Apostolic authority itself is exercised through service (1 Cor 4:1-13; 2 Cor 11-12; 1 Pet 5:1-4). Pastoral / elder authority is shepherding, not lording-over (1 Pet 5:2-3 explicitly echoes this language). The medieval and modern Church's recurring drift toward hierarchical / clerical / coercive forms is recurrently challenged by recovery of this Matthean ethic.
4. The ransom-saying, lytron anti pollōn. "Just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many." The clause is the shortest, densest atonement statement in the Synoptic tradition, sometimes called the Lösegeld-Wort in German scholarship.
- Lytron, ransom; the price paid to release a captive (or in commercial Greek, the price paid to redeem a slave from bondage).
- Anti pollōn, for / in place of many. The preposition anti carries substitutionary force: in exchange for, in the place of. Many readers have seen here the verbal foundation of substitutionary atonement.
- Pollōn, many. The Hebrew background is Isaiah 53 (esp. 53:11-12, "by His knowledge the Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many … He poured out Himself to death … and bore the sin of many"). The "many" of Matt 20:28 echoes the "many" of Isa 53.
5. Atonement-theory implications. The verse is one of the central data-points for atonement theology:
- Ransom theory (early patristic; Origen, Gregory of Nyssa): the ransom was paid to Satan, who held humanity captive through sin. Christ's life ransomed humanity from Satan's claim. Critiqued by Anselm as giving Satan rights he never possessed.
- Satisfaction theory (Anselm, Cur Deus Homo, 1098): the ransom is paid to God's own honor / justice; Christ's self-gift satisfies the divine right to honor.
- Penal substitution (Calvin, mainstream Reformed): the ransom is the penalty for sin paid by the substitute, the anti pollōn preposition is decisively substitutionary.
- Christus Victor (Gustaf Aulén, 1931): the ransom is part of the cosmic victory over Satan, sin, and death, Christ's death ransoms / liberates humanity by defeating its captors.
- Moral influence (Abelard, more modern liberal traditions): the ransom is the demonstration of God's love that moves the human heart to repent.
The mainstream evangelical reading (Carson, Schreiner, Moo, France, Davies-Allison) treats anti pollōn as decisively substitutionary while affirming the broader Christus-Victor and moral-influence dimensions as complementary. The ransom is to whom the verse leaves slightly underspecified, the how (a life-for-many exchange) is what the verse foregrounds.
6. The Christological titles. Ho hyios tou anthrōpou, "the Son of Man", Jesus's signature self-designation, drawing on Daniel 7:13-14 (the heavenly Son-of-Man figure given universal dominion). The title is exalted (Danielic kingship) and humble (the title for "human being" in OT idiom). The passage holds both poles: the Son of Man is the heavenly figure who did not come to be served (despite universal entitlement) but to serve and to give His life.
Patristic / scholarly note
Patristic. Origen (Commentary on Matthew 16.8) develops the ransom-from-Satan reading. Chrysostom (Homilies on Matthew 65) emphasizes both the pastoral (anti-clericalism) and the soteriological (substitutionary) dimensions. Gregory of Nyssa (Catechetical Oration 22-26) gives the most extensive patristic treatment of the to whom was the ransom paid question.
Anselm. Cur Deus Homo (1098) reframes the atonement question against the ransom-from-Satan tradition: the satisfaction is owed to God's honor, not to the devil. This becomes the foundational reframing for Western atonement theology.
Reformation. Calvin (Institutes II.16-17; Commentary on Matthew, 1555) develops the penal-substitution reading: the ransom is the penalty for sin paid by the substitute. The Reformed scholastic tradition (Owen, The Death of Death in the Death of Christ, 1647) treats the verse as decisive for definite (limited) atonement, for many, not for all. The Arminian counter-reading takes many as a Hebrew idiom for "the multitude" / "all" (cf. Romans 5:15-19's many-language).
Modern scholarship. R. T. France (The Gospel of Matthew NICNT, 2007); Donald Hagner (Matthew WBC, 1995); D. A. Carson (Matthew EBC, 1984); Davies & Allison (Matthew ICC, 3 vols, 1988-1997); John Nolland (Matthew NIGTC, 2005); Craig Keener (Matthew, 1999); Leon Morris (The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, 1955), the standard work on lytron and atonement vocabulary; Murray Harris (Slave of Christ, 1999) on doulos language.
Contemporary atonement debate. The verse is central to the recent atonement debates: Steve Chalke and Alan Mann (The Lost Message of Jesus, 2003) critique penal substitution; Garry Williams, Steve Jeffery, Mike Ovey (Pierced for Our Transgressions, 2007) defend it; Joel B. Green and Mark Baker (Recovering the Scandal of the Cross, 2000) propose a "kaleidoscopic" model that holds multiple atonement images together. The Matt 20:28 ransom-saying is at the center of all these debates.
Anti-empire / anti-domination application. The verse has been a major resource for Christian critiques of empire and ecclesiastical power: from John Howard Yoder (The Politics of Jesus, 1972) to N. T. Wright (Jesus and the Victory of God, 1996) to Stanley Hauerwas. The Christianity-and-Africa source-ingest (Christianity in Africa - Roots, Distortions, and Reclamation (ris3n)) deploys this verse against the colonial-Christianity that sanctified imperial domination, the very pattern Christ explicitly forbade.
Connection to other passages
- Mark 10:42-45, the Markan parallel (slightly different wording; same teaching)
- Luke 22:24-27, Lukan parallel set at the Last Supper
- John 13:1-17, the foot-washing as enacted parable of the same teaching
- Isaiah 53:11-12, the Suffering Servant background ("bore the sin of many")
- Philippians 2:5-11, the kenosis-and-exaltation pattern paralleling the descent-and-vindication of the Son of Man
- 1 Peter 5:1-4, apostolic application: shepherds not lording over the flock
- 1 Corinthians 4:1-13, Pauline servant-leadership pattern
- Matthew 23:8-12, parallel teaching: greatest is servant; do not be called rabbi
- Daniel 7:13-14, the Son-of-Man Christological background
- Galatians 3.28, the soteriological-equality complement (no slave nor free in Christ)
Key words
- G2961 - katakyrieuō (pending), katakyrieuō (to lord it over, dominate)
- G2715 - katexousiazō (pending), katexousiazō (to exercise authority over)
- G1249 - diakonos (pending), diakonos (servant, attendant)
- G1401 - doulos, doulos (bondservant)
- G3083 - lytron, lytron (ransom), the load-bearing atonement word; NT hapax in this form
- G0473 - anti (pending), anti (in place of, in exchange for), the substitutionary preposition
- G5207 - hyios tou anthrōpou (pending), hyios tou anthrōpou (Son of Man), Jesus's signature title
Quoted in
- _log-archive-2026-04
- Acts 2.17-18
- Atonement Theory Spread
- Black People Shouldnt Be Christian
- Christianity in Africa - Roots, Distortions, and Reclamation (ris3n)
- Colossians 3.11
- Colossians 4.1
- Ephesians 6
- Isaiah 53.4-7
- John 8.34-36
- Jude 1
- Luke 15.11-32
- Luke 7.1-10
- Mark 12
- Matthew 18.23-35
- Matthew 8.5-12
- Papal Bulls and Slavery
- Philemon 1.16
- Philippians 2
- Philippians 2.5-11
- Philippians 2.5-7
- Philippians 2.5-8
- Philippians 2.6-8
- Revelation 2.20
- Slave Bible
Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB), Copyright © 1960, 1971, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org