Concept

Kuntillet Ajrud

Intro

Kuntillet Ajrud is a small desert way station on a lonely hilltop in the northeastern Sinai, about 50 km south of Kadesh Barnea, along an old road that linked the Gulf of Aqaba to Gaza. Around 800 BC, travelers and staff there wrote blessings on two large storage jars and on plastered walls. Some of those blessings invoke "Yahweh of Samaria and his asherah" and "Yahweh of Teman and his asherah."

Critics often present the find as proof that the Israelites' God had a wife, and that the Bible's one-God faith was a late invention. The find shows something real: some Israelites around 800 BC mixed the worship of Yahweh with an asherah. But that is exactly what the Old Testament says happened, and exactly what its prophets and reforming kings condemned. Kuntillet Ajrud confirms the biblical account of Israel's spiritual drift. It does not tell us what Israel's Scriptures taught.

◎ See this page's graph and discover linked topics →

In full

Kuntillet Ajrud (Hebrew Horvat Teman) is an Iron Age II site in the northeastern Sinai Peninsula, excavated by Ze'ev Meshel of Tel Aviv University in 1975 and 1976 and published in full in 2012. Radiocarbon analysis places its short occupation around the turn of the 9th to 8th century BC, and the main texts are usually dated around 800 BC. The site yielded two large decorated storage jars (Pithos A and Pithos B), ink inscriptions on plaster, and inscribed vessels in an early Hebrew script. Three texts pair Yahweh with 'šrth, "his asherah": "Yahweh of Samaria and his asherah" on Pithos A, and "Yahweh of Teman and his asherah" on Pithos B and on a plaster fragment. A roughly contemporary tomb inscription from Khirbet el-Qom in Judah uses the same pairing. A fragmentary plaster text also mentions El and Baal.

The scholarly debate turns on two questions. First, does asherah here name the Canaanite goddess Asherah, or a wooden cult object (the "asherah" the Bible says was set up beside altars)? The grammar matters: the pronominal suffix "his" is not normally attached to a personal name, which pushes many scholars toward the cult-object reading. Second, do the painted figures on Pithos A (two Bes-like figures and a seated lyre player) illustrate the blessing written near them, or were they painted independently? On any reading, the find documents popular, syncretistic Yahwism of the kind the Hebrew Bible itself records and condemns (Deuteronomy 16.21; 1 Kings 15:13; 2 Kings 21:7; 2 Kings 23.6). It is evidence of what some Israelites practiced, not of what normative Israelite religion taught.

Discovery

• Site. A low isolated hill in the northeastern Sinai, about 50 km south of Kadesh Barnea, beside one of the few water sources on the Darb el-Ghazza, the route from the Eilat region to Gaza. It is in the Sinai, not in Jordan; the Jordan Valley site with a famous plaster text is Tell Deir Alla, a different place with a different inscription.
• Excavation. Ze'ev Meshel (Tel Aviv University) excavated in 1975 and 1976, when the Sinai was under Israeli administration.
• Publication. The final report, Kuntillet 'Ajrud (Horvat Teman): An Iron Age II Religious Site on the Judah-Sinai Border, appeared in 2012 from the Israel Exploration Society, edited by Meshel with chapters by Shmuel Ahituv and others on the inscriptions. The long delay fed decades of argument from preliminary photos and drawings.
• Date. Radiocarbon dating points to occupation around 800 BC, in the era of Jehoash and Jeroboam II of Israel.

The inscriptions

1. Pithos A: "Yahweh of Samaria and his asherah." A blessing formula in which the writer blesses the addressees by Yahweh of Samaria and his asherah. Samaria was the capital of the northern kingdom.
2. Pithos B and a plaster fragment: "Yahweh of Teman and his asherah." Teman ("the south") recalls the southern regions the Bible associates with Yahweh's coming (Edom, Seir, Paran). The phrase is a regional title for the same God, as "Yahweh of Samaria" is.
3. Plaster text naming El and Baal. A broken poetic text speaks of El shining forth and mountains melting, and of Baal in a day of battle. It shows that the vocabulary of Canaanite religion was in use at the site.
4. Khirbet el-Qom parallel. A tomb inscription from Khirbet el-Qom, between Lachish and Hebron, excavated by William Dever in 1967 and 1968 and dated roughly 750 to 700 BC, blesses a man named Uriyahu by Yahweh and speaks of deliverance from his enemies by Yahweh's asherah. It is carved above an incised hand. Its reading is difficult, but it shows the formula was known in Judah too.

The "his asherah" debate

1. Goddess reading. Some scholars (William Dever in Did God Have a Wife?, and others in the tradition of Mark Smith) read asherah as the goddess Asherah, Yahweh's consort in popular religion.
2. Cult-object reading. Others read it as the wooden cult symbol called an asherah, a post or stylized tree set up at a sanctuary. The Bible itself uses the word this way: Deuteronomy 16.21 forbids planting one beside Yahweh's altar.
3. The grammar. The form 'šrth carries the pronominal suffix "his." In Hebrew, a suffix of this kind normally attaches to a common noun ("his altar," "his house"), not to a personal name, and divine names such as Yahweh or Baal do not take it. That is the main reason many epigraphers prefer "his asherah" as a cult object belonging to Yahweh's worship. Defenders of the goddess reading answer that the object and the goddess were closely linked, or propose other parsings of the final letter; those proposals remain contested.
4. Why the answer does not change the apologetic point. Whether the asherah is a goddess or her symbol, the Bible already says Israelites set up exactly such things and were condemned for it. The find adds date and detail; it does not add a new religion the text conceals.

The drawings

• What is painted. Pithos A carries two standing figures with features of the Egyptian dwarf-god Bes, and to the right a seated figure playing a lyre. Meshel's early description took the lyre player as a seated woman. Other scenes include a cow suckling a calf, ibexes flanking a tree, and a lion.
• No label names any figure as a deity. The lyre player carries no inscription identifying it as Asherah, El or anyone else. A popular claim that the jar shows "El playing a harp" is not what the jar shows: the instrument is a lyre, and nothing on the jar names the player El.
• Do drawing and text belong together? The famous blessing is written just above the figures, and ink and paint overlap. Pirhiya Beck's study of the drawings had to sort out which marks came first, and later studies distinguish several hands at work on the jars. A widely reported assessment is that the drawing was added after the inscription, so the two may be unrelated. Many scholars read the two standing figures as Bes-type figures, both apparently male, rather than as Yahweh and a consort. The drawing cannot safely be used as a picture of "Yahweh and his asherah."

What it shows

1. Popular syncretism around 800 BC is real. Some Israelites, north and south, paired Yahweh with an asherah in blessing formulas.
2. Yahweh was the God invoked. The blessings are by Yahweh, with regional titles (Samaria, Teman). Yahweh is not one god among many in these texts; the asherah is attached to him.
3. The biblical description of the period is accurate. The Old Testament says the northern kingdom kept an Asherah in Samaria (1 Kings 16:33; 2 Kings 13:6; 2 Kings 17:16) and that Judah's kings and people repeatedly did the same.

What it does not show

1. It does not show normative Israelite religion. A blessing scrawled at a desert way station shows what some travelers and staff believed. It does not show what the Torah, the prophets or the Jerusalem temple taught, any more than graffiti in a modern bus station shows a church's creed.
2. It does not show that monotheism was invented late. The law against an asherah beside Yahweh's altar (Deuteronomy 16.21) presupposes the very practice Kuntillet Ajrud attests. On the theory that Deuteronomy was written under Josiah, see Josiah Wrote the Bible Objection Defeater.
3. It does not show that Yahweh was borrowed from the Canaanite pantheon. The texts name Yahweh by place, as Israel's God; the El and Baal vocabulary sits beside him in a mixed popular piety. See Yahweh Borrowed From the Canaanites Objection Defeater and Yahweh is a Son of Elyon Defeater.

The biblical record of syncretism and its condemnation

The Old Testament does not hide Israel's Asherah worship; it reports it and judges it.

• Deuteronomy 16.21, Thou shalt not plant thee an Asherah of any kind of tree beside the altar of Jehovah thy God, which thou shalt make thee. (ASV)
• 1 Kings 15:13, And also Maacah his mother he removed from being queen, because she had made an abominable image for an Asherah; and Asa cut down her image, and burnt it at the brook Kidron. (ASV)
• 2 Kings 21:7, And he set the graven image of Asherah, that he had made, in the house of which Jehovah said to David and to Solomon his son, In this house, and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, will I put my name for ever; (ASV)
• 2 Kings 23.6, And he brought out the Asherah from the house of Jehovah, without Jerusalem, unto the brook Kidron, and burned it at the brook Kidron, and beat it to dust, and cast the dust thereof upon the graves of the common people. (ASV)
• Jeremiah 44:17, But we will certainly perform every word that is gone forth out of our mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink-offerings unto her, as we have done, we and our fathers, our kings and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem; for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. (ASV)

Jeremiah 44 is the clearest case: the people themselves say their kings and fathers worshipped another deity, and the prophet answers that this is why judgment came. Kuntillet Ajrud is the kind of evidence those verses lead us to expect. A critic who uses it to prove "Israel was polytheistic" is restating the prophets' own accusation.

Evidential status

Mainstream consensus on the site, date and wording of the main inscriptions. Contested on whether asherah is the goddess or a cult object, and on whether the drawings illustrate the texts. Across those debates, scholars of every view agree that the texts reflect religious practice the biblical writers opposed, which is why the find sits comfortably beside the Old Testament's own history of Israel.

See also

• Biblical Archaeology, parent hub
• OT Polytheism Objection Defeater, its P5 rests on this find
• Israelite Monotheism, when exclusive Yahweh worship became the norm
• Yahweh Borrowed From the Canaanites Objection Defeater, the Canaanite-origins thesis
• Yahweh is a Son of Elyon Defeater, the El and Elyon reconstruction
• Mark Smith, the leading developmental reconstruction that cites this find
• Josiah Wrote the Bible Objection Defeater, the late-dating claim about Deuteronomy
• Tel Arad and Beersheba Altars, archaeology of the reforms that removed outlying cult sites
• Deir Alla Inscription, the other famous plaster text of around 800 BC, from the Jordan Valley
• Mesha Stele, a contemporary non-Israelite witness to Yahweh