Passage
John 1.1-3
John 1:1-3, Jn 1.1-3, Jn 1:1-3, Johannine PrologueBook: John · NASB95
Verse
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. (John 1:1-3, NASB95)
See this page's graph and discover linked topics
Immediate context (±2 verses)
NASB95 (NASB95)
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. (John 1:1-5, NASB95)
Setting
- Speaker: John the Apostle (the Evangelist), writing as inspired narrator. The voice is theological prologue.
- Audience: late-first-century Christian readership, Jewish believers familiar with Genesis 1:1 ("In the beginning") and the Hebrew dabar / memra concept; Hellenistic readers familiar with the Greek Logos tradition (Heraclitus, Stoicism, Philo of Alexandria). The prologue speaks to both.
- Location: traditionally Ephesus (where John ministered late in life, Irenaeus Against Heresies 3.1.1; Eusebius Hist. Eccl. 3.23, 3.39).
- Time period: late first century, c. AD 85-95 traditional dating.
Theological reading
This three-verse unit is the densest Christological declaration in the New Testament. Six load-bearing claims compressed into one prologue paragraph:
- Eternal pre-existence, en archē ēn ho logos: when "the beginning" of Genesis 1:1 occurred, the Word was already (imperfect ēn, ongoing pre-existent state). Christ does not begin in Genesis 1.1; He existed before it.
- Personal distinction from the Father, ho logos ēn pros ton theon: the Word was toward / with God (face-to-face relational presence). See G4314 - pros for the relational force. Two distinct persons; not modalism.
- Full deity, theos ēn ho logos: the Word was God by nature. Anarthrous predicate before verb (Colwell / Harner) makes this qualitative, the Word shares the essence of God, not just divine qualities. Not Arianism ("a god"); not modalism ("the same person as the Father").
- Eternal Trinitarian relation, houtos ēn en archē pros ton theon: v. 2 restates v. 1 summarily, emphasizing the eternal mutual indwelling. The Father / Word relation is constitutive of the divine being, not contingent.
- Creation through the Word, panta di' autou egeneto: all things came into being through Him (instrumental). The Word is not part of creation but the agent through whom creation happens. The verb egeneto (came into being) contrasts deliberately with ēn (was) of vv. 1-2: created things came-into-being; the Word was. Different verbs, different ontological categories.
- Universal scope of mediation, kai chōris autou egeneto oude hen ho gegonen: "and apart from Him not even one thing came into being that has come into being." Triple emphasis: all things, not even one thing apart from Him. Excludes any room for an Arian "one creature created by the Father, then everything else through that creature" Christology, every created thing comes through the Word.
The trio of verses is rigorously engineered against:
- Arianism, Christ as the highest creature. Refuted by en archē ēn (was, not came-to-be) + theos ēn + panta di' autou egeneto.
- Modalism / Sabellianism, Father, Son, Spirit as one person in different modes. Refuted by pros ton theon (relational distinction).
- Tritheism, three gods. Refuted by theos ēn ho logos, one divine essence, the Word participates fully.
- Polytheism / Gnostic emanation, hierarchy of intermediary beings. Refuted by panta di' autou, the Word is the only mediator of creation.
The Genesis-1 echo is deliberate. John deliberately frames his entire Gospel by echoing bereshit / en archē with his opening words. He pushes the reader to ask: what was, when "the beginning" of Genesis 1:1 occurred? Answer: the Word was. The Word predates the temporal beginning of creation.
Patristic. This passage anchors more patristic Christology than perhaps any other in Scripture. Origen (Commentary on John I-II, c. AD 230) develops the doctrine of eternal generation. Athanasius (Discourses Against the Arians I-II, c. AD 358) wields the imperfect ēn against Arius. Augustine (Tractates on John 1, c. AD 414) and Cyril of Alexandria (Commentary on John I, c. AD 425) build the dogmatic structure. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (AD 325, 381) is largely an exposition of these three verses. See John 1.1 for the detailed patristic treatment.
Reformed / modern. Calvin's Institutes I.13-14 and John commentary; D. A. Carson, The Gospel According to John PNTC, 1991; Andreas Köstenberger, John BECNT, 2004.
Why a separate page from John 1.1?
ris3n's notes cite "John 1:1-3" as a unit (9 occurrences) distinct from "John 1:1" alone (24 occurrences), the unit-citation typically emphasizes the creation-mediator claim of v. 3 alongside the deity claim of v. 1. While John 1.1 focuses on Christology qua Word, this page emphasizes the agency-of-creation claim (Christ as the Word through whom all things were made, paralleling Colossians 1.15-17 and Hebrews 1:2).
Key words
- G3056 - logos, logos (Word), the Christological subject
- G2316 - theos, theos (God), predicated, articular and anarthrous
- G0746 - arche, archē (beginning), temporal absolute
- G4314 - pros, pros (with / toward), relational orientation
- G1096 - ginomai, ginomai (come into being), contrasted with einai
- G1510 - eimi, eimi (be), Christ's pre-existence verb
Quoted in
Arguments and defeaters:
- 100 Questions for Evolutionists, via John 1.3
- Anointing Implies Subordination Objection Defeater, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Anyone Who Affirms Universals Must Affirm God, via John 1.1
- Argument from Cosmology (Guillen)
- Argument from Intelligibility
- Argument from Mathematical Truth
- Argument from Mathematics (Guillen)
- Argument from Neuroscience (Guillen), via John 1.1
- Argument from Origin of Life, via John 1.1
- Argument from Physics (Guillen), via John 1.1
- Argument from the Apophatic Limit of Formal Systems
- Argument from the Confession-Catharsis Convergence, via John 1.1
- Argument from the Continuance of Being
- Argument from the Costly-Signal Convergence, via John 1.1-18
- Argument from the Genetic Code, via John 1.1
- Argument from the Impossibility of an Actual Infinite Past, via John 1.1
- Argument from the Observer-Demand Convergence, via John 1.1-18
- Argument from the Pre-Given Logos, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18, John 1.3
- Argument from the Reality of Mathematical Infinity
- Argument from the Trans-Instinctual Agency Convergence
- Argument from the Universal Imagination Convergence, via John 1.3
- Argument from the Universal Storytelling Convergence, via John 1.1-14
- Argument from Thermodynamics, via John 1.3
- Biogenesis Argument, via John 1.3-4
- Build the Cosmological Argument, via John 1.3
- Cambrian Explosion Argument, via John 1.1
- Common Design vs Common Descent Argument, via John 1.1
- Convergent Evolution as Design Signal Argument, via John 1.1
- Cumulative Case for the Deity of Christ
- Evil as Privation of Good, via John 1.3
- Hand of God Argument
- Information Argument, via John 1.1
- Interdependency Argument, via John 1.3
- Jesus Has a God Therefore Not God Objection Defeater, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Jesus Never Claimed to Be God Objection Defeater, via John 1.1
- Kalam Cosmological Argument
- Manuscript Variants Bible Corruption Objection Defeater
- Miller-Urey Reframe Argument, via John 1.1
- Molecular Machines Argument, via John 1.1
- Nag Hammadi Suppressed Gospels Objection Defeater
- Necessary Being is an Intelligent Mind
- Necessity of the Incarnation, via John 1.1
- Orphan Genes Argument, via John 1.1
- Performative Self-Refutation of Atheist Denial, via John 1.1
- Protein Sequence Space Argument, via John 1.1
- Quinean Rejection of Modal Logic Objection Defeater, via John 1.1
- Quran Confirms Jesus is God Argument, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Quran Confirms the Trinity Argument, via John 1.1
- RNA World Failure Argument, via John 1.1
- Signature in the Cell Argument, via John 1.1
- Six Day Creation Falsified Objection Defeater
- Stealing from God Argument
- Transcendental Argument for God
- Trinity Coherence Defense (Latin-Thomist), via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Trinity Invented at Nicaea Objection Defeater, via John 1.1, John 1.1-2
- Unitarian Oneness Binitarian Objection Defeater, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Universal Probability Bound, via John 1.1
- Why Didnt Jesus Write Anything Himself Objection Defeater, via John 1.1, John 1.1-14
Concepts:
- Abiogenesis, via John 1.1
- Abiogenesis Under the Microscope, via John 1.1
- Arianism
- Big Bang, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem
- Christ is God, via John 1.1
- Christ Was Made (Misread Proof-Texts), via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Christian Discernment, via John 1.1
- Christianity, via John 1.1, John 1.1-14, John 1.1-18, John 1.3
- Christology, via John 1.1, John 1.1-14, John 1.1-18, John 1.3
- Christs Deity
- DNA, via John 1.3
- Doctrine, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Equivocation, via John 1.1
- Father-Son Authority Asymmetry
- Genesis Hermeneutics
- Genetic Code, via John 1.3
- Hypostatic Union, via John 1.1
- Idealism, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Incarnation, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Information Argument for Design, via John 1.1
- Islamic Dilemma, via John 1.1-18
- Jehovahs Witnesses, via John 1.1
- Jesus Said, via John 1.1, John 1.1-14
- Kalimatullah, via John 1.1-18
- Kantian Critique of Natural Theology, via John 1.1
- Laws of the Universe as Witness to Design
- Lesson 2.4, Christology in One Lesson, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- Lesson 4.5, Comparative Religion Engagement, via John 1.1
- Logos Christology, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18, John 1.3
- Mathematical Intelligibility of Nature
- Monotheism, via John 1.1
- Mormonism, via John 1.1
- Old Testament Christology, via John 1.1-18
- Old Testament Witness to the Deity of Christ, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18, John 1.3
- Oneness Pentecostalism
- Origins and Cosmology, via John 1.3
- Pantheism
- Process Theism, via John 1.3
- Rationalism, via John 1.1
- Substance Dualism, via John 1.1
- Tahrif, via John 1.1-18
- The Muslim Defense, via John 1.1
- Trinity, via John 1.1
- Trinity Common Objections, via John 1.1
- Trinity OT Stack (Five Texts), via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism
- Two Powers in Heaven, via John 1.1-18
- Young's Literal Translation, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- Zeitgeist - Constructed Religion Claims, via John 1.1
- Zero and the Metaphysics of Nothing
People:
- Avery Austin (God Logic), via John 1.1
- Bart Ehrman, via John 1.1-18
- Church Fathers, via John 1.1
- Jesus, via John 1.1-14
- John the Apostle, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
- John Wheeler, via John 1.1
- Philo of Alexandria, via John 1.1, John 1.1-18
Lexicon:
- G0746 - arche
- G1096 - ginomai
- G1510 - eimi, via John 1.1
- G2316 - theos, via John 1.1
- G2320 - theotes, via John 1.1
- G2936 - ktizo, via John 1.3
- G2937 - ktisis, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- G3004 - lego, via John 1.1-14
- G3056 - logos
- G3956 - pas
- G4138 - pleroma, via John 1.1
- G4314 - pros
- H0001 - ab, via John 1.1-18
- H1697 - dabar, via John 1.1, John 1.3
- H7218 - rosh, via John 1.1
- H7225 - reshit, via John 1.1
Guides:
Passages:
Other pages:
Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB), Copyright © 1960, 1971, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org