ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Argument

Jesus Never Founded Christianity Objection Defeater

Jesus never claimed Christianity, Jesus never founded Christianity, Jesus was a Jew not a Christian, Jesus didn't start a religion, Jesus never sided with Christianity, Christianity is not what Jesus taught

Intro

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

Brands, events, influencers advertise here

The objection sounds simple. "Jesus never claimed Christianity or sided with it. He was a Jew. He never used the word Christian, and he never meant to start a religion."

Part of that is true, and it should be granted at once. Jesus was a Jew. He went to the synagogue on the Sabbath. He never used the word "Christian." That name was first given to his followers in the city of Antioch, years after his resurrection.

But a name is a label for a thing. The question is whether Jesus started the thing. The Gospels say he did, in five ways.

First, he founded a community. He told Peter, "upon this rock I will build my church." He chose twelve men, trained them, and gave the community rules for settling sin among its members.

Second, he gave that community its central meal and its covenant. On the night before he died, he took the cup and said, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood," and told his followers, "this do in remembrance of me."

Third, he sent it out. After the resurrection he told them to make disciples of all the nations, to baptize them, and to teach them everything he had commanded.

Fourth, he put himself at the center. "Believe in God, believe also in me." "No one cometh unto the Father, but by me." Ordinary rabbis pointed people to the law. Jesus said the law, the prophets and the psalms were written "concerning me."

Fifth, it was never a break from Israel's faith. Jesus said he came "not to destroy, but to fulfil." The first Christians were Jews who believed that Jesus was Israel's Messiah, and thousands of them stayed zealous for the law.

So the honest answer is this. Jesus did not found a new religion with a new God. He founded a community of his own followers, around himself, as the fulfillment of Israel's faith. Later people called that community Christian. The name came later. The thing came from him.

In full

Defeater for the objection that Christianity is a later creation that Jesus himself never founded, endorsed or intended. It comes in three common forms. (A) The label form: "Jesus never said the word Christian, so he was not one." (B) The Jewish-identity form: "Jesus was a Jew and stayed a Jew. Christianity is a separate religion that broke away from Judaism after him." (C) The intention form: "Jesus was a teacher of love and repentance. He never meant to start a church, a ritual system or a religion; his followers did that."

The objection is used by atheists who want to separate the man from the movement, by some Muslim apologists who hold that Jesus was a prophet whose message was later changed, and by some Hebrew Israelite teachers (see Black Hebrew Israelite Doctrine) who hold that Jesus came only for Israel and that "Christianity" is a later Gentile religion. A close cousin, that Paul rather than Jesus invented the faith, has its own defeater at Paul Invented Christianity Objection Defeater.

The defeat structure is six-pronged. (1) Concession on the label: the word "Christian" appears three times in the New Testament, never on Jesus' lips, and it names the disciples after the fact (Acts 11:26). A name is not a founding. (2) The founding acts: Jesus speaks of "my church" (Matthew 16:18), gives it a procedure for discipline (Matthew 18:17), appoints the Twelve (Mark 3:14), and sends it to the nations with baptism and his own commands as its curriculum (Matthew 28:19-20). (3) The rite and the covenant: he institutes the meal his followers still keep and names it "the new covenant in my blood" (Luke 22:19-20; 1 Corinthians 11:23-25). (4) The center of the faith: he asks for faith in himself alongside faith in God (John 14:1), names himself the only way to the Father (John 14:6), and reads the whole of Scripture as about himself (Luke 24:44). (5) Fulfillment, not rupture: he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17), and the first church was Jewish (Acts 2:36, Acts 21:20). (6) Continuity: the men he trained preached him as Lord and Christ, and the earliest writers after them, Clement of Rome and Ignatius of Antioch, trace their faith straight back to him. This page is structured as debate prep.

Honest limits. This page does not claim that Jesus set up denominations, buildings, creeds in later wording, or church offices in the form they took centuries later. It does not claim that every church today is faithful to what he started; many are not, and that is a real charge (see Christians Behaving Badly Defeater). It also does not claim the Gospels use the word "church" often; they do not (see the honest limits below). The claim is narrower: the core of Christianity, a community of disciples gathered around Jesus as Messiah and Lord, keeping his meal, baptizing in the name he gave, and teaching what he commanded, comes from Jesus himself.

Argument structure

# Premise
P1 Jesus never used the word "Christian"; it was given to his disciples at Antioch (Acts 11:26) and then embraced by them (1 Peter 4:16). The word labels a community; whether Jesus founded the community is a separate question.
P2 Jesus founded a community of his own: "my church" (Matthew 16:18), with a rule of discipline (Matthew 18:17), twelve appointed leaders (Mark 3:14), and a commission to make disciples of all nations, baptizing and teaching his commands (Matthew 28:19-20).
P3 Jesus instituted the community's central rite and named its covenant: "This cup is the new covenant in my blood... this do in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19-20; 1 Corinthians 11:23-25).
P4 Jesus placed himself at the center of the faith: belief in him (John 14:1), access to the Father only through him (John 14:6), one flock under him as shepherd (John 10:16), all Scripture "concerning me" (Luke 24:44), and repentance preached "in his name unto all the nations" (Luke 24:46-47).
P5 This was not a break from Israel's faith but its fulfillment (Matthew 5:17); the first church was made of Jews who believed Jesus was Israel's Messiah (Acts 2:36, 2:41; Acts 21:20).
P6 The apostles Jesus trained preached him as Lord and Christ, and the earliest post-apostolic writers trace their gospel from God, to Christ, to the apostles, to them (1 Clement 42; Ignatius).
C Therefore the claim that Jesus never founded Christianity fails. He never used the later name, and he never founded a religion with a new God; but he founded the community, the rite, the mission and the faith-in-himself that the name "Christian" was coined to describe.

Form

Defensive (a defeater). P1 is a concession that separates a word from the thing it names, which is where the objection's force comes from. P2 and P3 are a founding-acts audit: they list what a founder does (gather followers, appoint leaders, set rules, set a rite, set a mission) and check the Gospels for each. P4 shows the content of the founded faith centers on Jesus himself, which no later follower could have added without changing what he taught. P5 answers the Jewish-identity form by showing continuity with Israel. P6 is a historical chain from Jesus to the apostles to the earliest writers after them. The argument does not need to prove Christianity true; it shows that if the Gospels and Acts are even roughly accurate about Jesus, Christianity is what he started. Soundness is contemporary: it rests on the New Testament text and the earliest post-apostolic letters.

Cheatsheet

The 30-second reply (read aloud). You're right about two things. Jesus was a Jew, and he never used the word "Christian." That name came later, in a city called Antioch. But a name is just a label. The question is who started the thing the label points to. Jesus said, "I will build my church." He picked twelve men and trained them. He gave his followers a meal to keep and said, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this in remembrance of me." He told them to go to every nation, baptize people, and teach everything he commanded. And he told people to believe in him. That's not a man who never meant to start anything. Christianity didn't break away from his Jewish faith. It's what his followers called the community he built. So here's my question: if Jesus didn't start it, who did, and what did they add that he didn't say?

The 5 fast facts:

  1. The name came later, the thing did not. "The disciples were called Christians first in Antioch" (Acts 11:26, ASV). They were already disciples. The name was added to them.
  2. "My church." "Upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18, ASV).
  3. The meal and the covenant. "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, even that which is poured out for you" (Luke 22:20, ASV), with "this do in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19, ASV).
  4. The mission. "Make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them... teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you" (Matthew 28:19-20, ASV).
  5. The first church was Jewish. Jerusalem's elders told Paul, "Thou seest, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of them that have believed; and they are all zealous for the law" (Acts 21:20, ASV).

The 3 strongest counter-moves:

  • "Separate the word from the thing." Ask whether a thing can exist before its name. The disciples existed before Antioch named them. The objection proves only that Jesus did not coin a label.
  • "Name the founder." If Jesus did not found the community of his disciples, ask who did, and which of its core features (baptism, the Lord's meal, the mission, faith in Jesus) came from that person rather than from Jesus.
  • "What did he mean by 'my church'?" Ask what Jesus meant if he did not mean a community of his own followers that would outlast him.

Reciprocal concessions (grant the small point, then collect a bigger one):

  • Grant: Jesus never used the word "Christian." Now collect: then the argument is about vocabulary, not history. "Christian" means a follower of Christ, and Jesus called people to follow him.
  • Grant: Jesus was a Jew and kept the faith of Israel. Now collect: so were the apostles and the whole first church. Christianity began as Jews believing that the Jewish Messiah had come. That is fulfillment, not abandonment.
  • Grant: much of what churches do today is not what Jesus started. Now collect: then you are judging today's churches by what Jesus started, which means there is a standard he started. That is a call to reform, not proof he founded nothing.

The closing line. Jesus never said the word "Christian." He said "my church," "my blood," "my commandments," and "believe also in me." The name came later. The thing came from him.

Grammar and hermeneutics

  1. "Christian" is a name given, then owned. The Greek Christianos occurs in only three verses of the New Testament (Acts 11:26, Acts 26:28, 1 Peter 4:16). In Acts 11:26 the disciples "were called" Christians; the wording reports a name applied to them. In Acts 26:28 it is on the lips of a king, Agrippa: "With but little persuasion thou wouldest fain make me a Christian" (ASV). By 1 Peter 4:16 believers own it: "if a man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God in this name" (ASV). Before the name, Acts calls the movement "the Way" (Acts 24:14; Acts 9:2).
  2. "Church" is an Israelite word. The Greek ekklēsia means an assembly (see G1577 - ekklesia). Stephen uses it of Israel itself: Moses "was in the church in the wilderness" (Acts 7:38, ASV). When Jesus says "my church," he is not borrowing a pagan category. He is speaking of an assembly of God's people, and calling it his.
  3. "My" is the key word. In Matthew 16:18 the future tense ("I will build") and the possessive ("my church") together describe a community that does not yet fully exist, that Jesus himself will build, and that belongs to him. It comes right after Peter's confession, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16, ASV). The community is built on the confession of who Jesus is.
  4. "New covenant" is a quotation, not an invention. Jeremiah promised, "I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah" (Jeremiah 31:31, ASV). When Jesus says, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood," he claims that Jeremiah's promise to Israel is being kept in his own death. That is the language of fulfillment within Israel's story, and the language of a founder.
  5. The commission says what and how. In Matthew 28:19-20 the command is to "make disciples," and the verse says how: "baptizing them" and "teaching them." The content of the teaching is "all things whatsoever I commanded you." The curriculum of the community is Jesus' own words.

P1, The name came later; the thing did not

Affirmative case

  1. The concession is real. Jesus never uses the word "Christian" in the Gospels. The verse that tells us where it began says, "the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch" (Acts 11:26, ASV). By then the movement had already spread from Jerusalem through Judaea and Samaria to Syria.
  2. The disciples existed before the name. The same verse says Barnabas and Saul "were gathered together with the church" for a whole year. The church and the disciples come first in the sentence; the name comes last. Things are often named after they exist.
  3. The name describes them by Jesus. Christianos is built on Christos, "Christ," the title "Messiah." Whoever coined it, the name identified the group by their loyalty to Jesus as the Christ. That is the very thing the objection says Jesus had nothing to do with.
  4. The name was soon owned under pressure. By 1 Peter 4:16 it is a name worth suffering for: "if a man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God in this name" (ASV).

Anticipated objections

  1. "If Jesus wanted a new religion, he would have named it."
  2. "The name was an insult from outsiders, so it does not tell us what Jesus intended."

Rebuttals

  1. Founders rarely name the thing they found. The point is not what Jesus called it, but whether he gathered it. In any case the objection grants that his followers were called after him, by his title. Failure-mode: treating a label as the test of origin.
  2. Granted, and it helps. If outsiders coined the name, then outsiders saw a distinct group defined by loyalty to Christ within a few years of the crucifixion. That is independent testimony that the community centered on him.

P2, Jesus founded a community

Affirmative case

  1. "My church." "And I also say unto thee, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18, ASV). The community belongs to Jesus, he will build it, and it will last.
  2. It has rules for its members. "And if he refuse to hear them, tell it unto the church: and if he refuse to hear the church also, let him be unto you as the Gentile and the tax collector" (Matthew 18:17, ASV). Jesus gives a procedure for how the community deals with sin among its members. A teacher with no intention of founding anything does not set up a process for a body that does not exist.
  3. It has appointed leaders. "And he appointed twelve, that they might be with him, and that he might send them forth to preach" (Mark 3:14, ASV). Matthew lists "the names of the twelve apostles" (Matthew 10:2, ASV). Jesus ties the number to Israel himself: "ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matthew 19:28, ASV). That fits a renewed people of God, not a passing school of thought.
  4. It has a mission and a curriculum. "Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world" (Matthew 28:19-20, ASV). The community has an entry rite (Baptism), a teaching program (his commands), a scope (all nations), and a promise of his presence until the end.
  5. It has a witness to carry. "Ye shall be my witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea and Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth" (Acts 1:8, ASV).

Anticipated objections

  1. "Matthew 16:18 and 28:19 are later additions put on Jesus' lips by the church."
  2. "The Twelve were just students, like any rabbi's disciples."

Rebuttals

  1. Then the objection changes. The claim is no longer "Jesus never founded Christianity" but "the Gospels are wrong about Jesus." That is a different argument, about the reliability of the Gospels (see Historicity of Jesus), and it has to be made with evidence, not assumed. And the founding acts do not rest on one or two verses: the Twelve appear in all four Gospels, the meal in the first three and in Paul (see P3), and the sending of the disciples in all four.
  2. A rabbi's students did not form a body with its own discipline, rite and worldwide mission. Jesus' disciples were sent out to preach in his name, told to baptize, given a meal to repeat in his memory, and told to teach his commands. That is a community, not a classroom.

P3, Jesus instituted its rite and its covenant

Affirmative case

  1. The meal. "And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and gave to them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19, ASV).
  2. The covenant. "And the cup in like manner after supper, saying, This cup is the new covenant in my blood, even that which is poured out for you" (Luke 22:20, ASV). Matthew records, "this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many unto remission of sins" (Matthew 26:28, ASV). See New Covenant.
  3. Paul hands on the same words, as received from the Lord. "For I received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus in the night in which he was betrayed took bread... This cup is the new covenant in my blood: this do, as often as ye drink it, in remembrance of me" (1 Corinthians 11:23-25, ASV). This is one of Paul's letters, and he traces the rite not to himself but to "the Lord Jesus in the night in which he was betrayed."
  4. A repeated rite is a founding act. "This do in remembrance of me" is a command to repeat. A rite that a group repeats in memory of its founder, and that defines its covenant with God, is one of the clearest marks of a founded community.
  5. The first church kept it at once. "And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' teaching and fellowship, in the breaking of bread and the prayers" (Acts 2:42, ASV).

Anticipated objections

  1. "The Last Supper was just a Passover meal. Jesus was keeping a Jewish feast, not founding a Christian one."
  2. "Paul invented the Lord's Supper and the Gospels copied him."

Rebuttals

  1. It was a Passover setting, and he changed its meaning. The Gospels place the meal at Passover, and that matters: Jesus is not abandoning Israel's feast. But he gives the bread and cup new words ("my body," "my blood," "the new covenant") and a new command ("in remembrance of me"). A Jew keeping Passover does not say the cup is a new covenant in his own blood. That is fulfillment of Israel's feast and founding of a new rite in one act.
  2. Paul says the opposite. He says he "received of the Lord" what he passed on. The rite also appears in Mark, Matthew and Luke. The claim that Paul made it up has its own answer at Paul Invented Christianity Objection Defeater.

P4, Jesus put himself at the center of the faith

Affirmative case

  1. Faith in him beside faith in God. "Let not your heart be troubled: believe in God, believe also in me" (John 14:1, ASV).
  2. The only way to the Father. "I am the way, and the truth, and the life: no one cometh unto the Father, but by me" (John 14:6, ASV).
  3. One flock under him. "And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice: and they shall become one flock, one shepherd" (John 10:16, ASV). Jesus foresees a single community made of more than one "fold," gathered by his voice under himself as shepherd.
  4. All Scripture concerning him. "All things must needs be fulfilled, which are written in the law of Moses, and the prophets, and the psalms, concerning me" (Luke 24:44, ASV). See Messianic Prophecy.
  5. Preached in his name to all nations. "Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer, and rise again from the dead the third day; and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name unto all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem" (Luke 24:46-47, ASV).
  6. Why this matters. A teacher who points away from himself to God's law founds no movement around himself. A teacher who says "believe also in me," and sends his followers to preach in his name, has made himself the center of the faith. That is the faith the word "Christian" names. Whether his claims about himself were true is a further question (see Liar Lunatic or Lord and Jesus Never Claimed to Be God Objection Defeater); that he made them is what matters here.

Anticipated objections

  1. "Those sayings are mostly from John, the latest Gospel."
  2. "Jesus pointed people to God and the kingdom, not to himself."

Rebuttals

  1. Not only John. "My church" and the commission are in Matthew; "the new covenant in my blood" and "concerning me" are in Luke; the appointing of the Twelve is in Mark. The self-centered shape of Jesus' teaching runs through all four Gospels. For the wider question of what Jesus claimed about himself, see Jesus Never Claimed to Be God Objection Defeater.
  2. He did both, and tied them together. Jesus preached the Kingdom of God, and he also said that people's response to him decided their place in it. Asking for belief in himself beside belief in God (John 14:1) is not pointing away from himself.

P5, Fulfillment, not a break from Israel

Affirmative case

  1. Jesus came to fulfil. "Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy, but to fulfil" (Matthew 5:17, ASV).
  2. He lived as a faithful Jew. He "entered, as his custom was, into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up to read" (Luke 4:16, ASV). He said "salvation is from the Jews" (John 4:22, ASV), and he sent the Twelve first "to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 10:6, ASV).
  3. The first church was Jewish. Peter preached to Jews in Jerusalem: "Let all the house of Israel therefore know assuredly, that God hath made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom ye crucified" (Acts 2:36, ASV). "There were added unto them in that day about three thousand souls" (Acts 2:41, ASV). Years later the elders in Jerusalem told Paul, "Thou seest, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of them that have believed; and they are all zealous for the law" (Acts 21:20, ASV).
  4. The apostles worshipped Israel's God. "The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Servant Jesus" (Acts 3:13, ASV). Paul, on trial, said he served "the God of our fathers, believing all things which are according to the law, and which are written in the prophets" (Acts 24:14, ASV).
  5. The Gentiles were grafted into Israel's tree. Paul tells Gentile believers they were "grafted in among them" and warns, "it is not thou that bearest the root, but the root thee" (Romans 11:17-18, ASV). He opens that chapter, "Did God cast off his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite" (Romans 11:1, ASV).
  6. So "Jew or Christian" is a false choice for the first generation. The Christians of Acts 2 and Acts 21 were Jews who believed Israel's Messiah had come. For how the church and Israel relate after that, and the debate over it, see Israel and the Church.

Anticipated objections

  1. "Jesus said he was sent only to Israel (Matthew 15:24). So a Gentile church is not what he founded."
  2. "Later Christianity did break from Judaism, and Christians persecuted Jews."

Rebuttals

  1. Israel first, then the nations. In his earthly ministry Jesus said, "I was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24, ASV). After the resurrection he sent the same disciples to "all the nations" (Matthew 28:19; Luke 24:47, "beginning from Jerusalem"). He also spoke of "other sheep... not of this fold" (John 10:16). The order is Israel first, then the world, which is exactly the order of Acts and of Paul: "to the Jew first, and also to the Greek" (Romans 1:16, ASV).
  2. The later split is real, and the sin is real. Jewish and Gentile communities did separate over time, and Christians have persecuted Jews, which is a grave wrong. Paul's warning to Gentile believers, "glory not over the branches" (Romans 11:18), condemns that arrogance from within the faith. But a later split does not show what Jesus founded. Judging an origin by what came after it is the genetic fallacy run forward.

P6, Continuity from Jesus to the apostles to the earliest church

Affirmative case

  1. The apostles preached Jesus, not a new idea of their own. Peter's first sermon ends, "God hath made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom ye crucified" (Acts 2:36, ASV). The men Jesus trained made him the center of their message from the first day.
  2. Clement traces the chain. Writing from Rome to Corinth around AD 95-96, Clement of Rome says: "The apostles have preached the Gospel to us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ [has done so] from God. Christ therefore was sent forth by God, and the apostles by Christ" (1 Clement 42, Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 1, PDF p. 14). The earliest Christian writing outside the New Testament places the origin of its message in Jesus, not in the apostles.
  3. Ignatius uses the word "Christianity" and places it in Israel's story. Ignatius of Antioch, bishop of the very city where the disciples were first called Christians, wrote on his way to martyrdom around AD 110: "It is absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity, that so every tongue which believeth might be gathered together to God" (To the Magnesians 10, Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 1, PDF p. 44). Whatever one makes of his wording, Ignatius sees the faith in Christ as the goal toward which Israel's faith was moving, not as a rival invented later.
  4. For Ignatius the name must match the thing. He asks the Roman church to pray "that I may not merely be called a Christian, but really be found to be one" (To the Romans 3, Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 1, PDF p. 52). That is P1 in his own words: the label is worth nothing without the reality.
  5. The church is where Christ is. Ignatius writes, "wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (To the Smyrnaeans 8, Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 1, PDF p. 62). "Catholic" here means universal, not a later denomination. The earliest writers define the church by Jesus, not Jesus by the church.

Anticipated objections

  1. "Clement and Ignatius were church leaders protecting their own institution. Of course they traced it to Jesus."
  2. "Ignatius' line about Judaism sounds anti-Jewish."

Rebuttals

  1. They traced it to Jesus through people who were alive to check. Clement wrote within living memory of the apostles, to a church Paul had founded. A claim that the gospel came "from the Lord Jesus Christ" through the apostles was open to challenge by people who had known them. And the claim matches the New Testament documents, which are earlier still.
  2. His point is about believers in Christ, not about Jews as a people. In context Ignatius is warning believers in Magnesia that it is "absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize." It is fair to say later Christians used similar language against Jews in ways that were wrong (see P5, rebuttal 2). The quotation is used here for one point only: the earliest bishop to use the word "Christianity" saw it as the fulfillment of Israel's faith.

Answering the common variants

"Paul invented Christianity, not Jesus." The rite Paul hands on, he says he "received of the Lord" (1 Corinthians 11:23). The Twelve, the meal, the mission and the call to believe in Jesus are in the Gospels independent of Paul, and the Jerusalem apostles accepted Paul's gospel. Full answer: Paul Invented Christianity Objection Defeater. For the related claims that the faith came from a sect or a myth rather than from Jesus, see Essene Origin of Christianity Objection Defeater and Christ Before Jesus Thesis Defeater.

"Jesus only taught love, not religion." Jesus did teach love, and he quoted the law of Moses to do it: love God with all your heart, and love your neighbor as yourself, for "on these two commandments the whole law hangeth, and the prophets" (Matthew 22:40, ASV). But he defined the love of his followers by himself: "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you... By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples" (John 13:34-35, ASV). Love "as I have loved you," as the mark of "my disciples," is love with Jesus at its center. The same teacher also gave a rite, a mission and a community. "Love, not religion" keeps half of what he said.

"The church today is not what Jesus started." Often true, and worth saying. Churches have added things Jesus never taught, left out things he did, and abused people in his name (see Christians Behaving Badly Defeater and No True Scotsman Charge Defeater). But this is a charge of corruption, not a proof that there was nothing to corrupt. The very complaint assumes a standard, "what Jesus started," against which today's churches can be measured. That standard is the community, rite, mission and teaching set out in P2 to P4.

"Jesus never claimed to be God, so Christianity's view of him is a later invention." That is a separate question about what Jesus claimed about himself, answered at Jesus Never Claimed to Be God Objection Defeater. This page needs only the weaker point in P4: Jesus put faith in himself at the center of what he taught.

"Jesus was a Jew, so Christianity, a Gentile religion, is foreign to him." Christianity began as a Jewish movement, led by Jews, in Jerusalem, preaching that Israel's Messiah had come (P5). Gentiles were added later, "grafted in" to Israel's tree, not the other way round. For the Hebrew Israelite form of this claim, see Black Hebrew Israelite Doctrine.

Master objections to the defeater

MO1: "You are using the Gospels to prove what Jesus said. But the Gospels were written by Christians, so they read the church back into Jesus."

  • The Gospels were written by his followers, and that is worth stating. But the objection proves too much. The objector's own picture of Jesus, a Jewish teacher of love who never meant to found anything, also comes from the Gospels; there is no other detailed source. If the Gospels can be trusted for "Jesus was a Jew who taught love," the objector needs a reason they cannot be trusted for "I will build my church" and "this do in remembrance of me." Picking only the verses that suit the conclusion is not history. See Historicity of Jesus.

MO2: "Jesus expected the world to end soon. He would not found an institution for the long term."

  • Jesus does speak of his return and of the end. But the founding acts he performs assume a community that continues: a meal to repeat "as often as ye drink it," a commission to "all the nations," a promise "I am with you always, even unto the end of the world," and a church that "the gates of Hades shall not prevail against." Whatever one concludes about his teaching on the end, those acts describe a community meant to last until it comes.

MO3: "Calling it 'Christianity' and 'a religion' is the problem. Jesus started a movement, not a religion."

  • If "religion" means bureaucracy, buildings and empty ritual, Jesus did not start one, and he condemned empty religion in his own day (Matthew 23:3, "they say, and do not"). But if "religion" means a community with beliefs, a way of worship, a rite and a way of life, that is exactly what he gathered. The quarrel is over the word, and P1 already granted the word.

MO4: "The early Christians themselves were divided. There was no single 'Christianity' for Jesus to found."

  • The early communities did argue, and Acts and Paul's letters record it openly (for example, the Pharisees who believed and wanted Gentiles circumcised, Acts 15). But they argued as one movement about how to follow the same Jesus, keeping the same meal and baptism, under apostles he had appointed. Disagreement inside a family is not proof there was no family.

Honest limits

  • "Church" is rare in the Gospels. A Strong's search for ekklēsia (G1577) returns 115 New Testament verses, and only two of them are in the Gospels, both in Matthew: Matthew 16:18 and Matthew 18:17. The case does not rest on that word. It rests on the founding acts (the Twelve, the meal, the commission, the call to believe in him) recorded across the Gospels.
  • "Christian" is rare too. The Greek Christianos (G5546) appears in three verses, all after the Gospels. The page concedes Jesus never used it.
  • The case depends on the Gospels being broadly reliable. Someone who rejects them as history will not be moved by these verses alone; that person needs the separate case for the Gospels' reliability.
  • This page does not settle later questions about church government, which denomination is most faithful, or exactly how Israel and the church relate today. It claims only that the community and faith Christians call Christianity came from Jesus.
  • Ignatius and Clement are early witnesses, not proofs. They show what the generation after the apostles believed about where their faith came from.

Tactical opening / closing

Opening. You're right that Jesus never said the word "Christian," and you're right that he was Jewish. I'll grant both. So let's ask the real question: did Jesus gather a group of followers, give them something to do, and send them out? Because if he did, then he started the thing, whatever people later called it.

Closing. Here's what I see in the Gospels. He said "my church." He chose twelve. He gave a meal and called it a new covenant in his blood. He told his followers to baptize the nations and teach everything he commanded. He said "believe also in me." And the first people to follow him were Jews who believed he was their Messiah. The name "Christian" came later. The thing came from him. So I'd ask you, as a friend: if not Jesus, then who started it?

Live-cite kit

Scripture:

  • Acts 11:26, "the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch." (ASV)
  • 1 Peter 4:16, "if a man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God in this name." (ASV)
  • Matthew 16:18, "upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it." (ASV)
  • Matthew 18:17, "tell it unto the church: and if he refuse to hear the church also, let him be unto you as the Gentile and the tax collector." (ASV)
  • Matthew 28:19-20, "make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you." (ASV)
  • Luke 22:19-20, "this do in remembrance of me... This cup is the new covenant in my blood, even that which is poured out for you." (ASV)
  • 1 Corinthians 11:23, "For I received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you." (ASV)
  • John 14:1, "believe in God, believe also in me." (ASV)
  • John 14:6, "no one cometh unto the Father, but by me." (ASV)
  • John 10:16, "they shall become one flock, one shepherd." (ASV)
  • Luke 24:44, "written in the law of Moses, and the prophets, and the psalms, concerning me." (ASV)
  • Matthew 5:17, "I came not to destroy, but to fulfil." (ASV)
  • Acts 2:36, "God hath made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom ye crucified." (ASV)
  • Acts 21:20, "how many thousands there are among the Jews of them that have believed; and they are all zealous for the law." (ASV)

Patristic:

  • Clement of Rome, 1 Clement 42 (ANF 1, PDF p. 14), "The apostles have preached the Gospel to us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ [has done so] from God."
  • Ignatius of Antioch, To the Magnesians 10 (ANF 1, PDF p. 44), "For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity."
  • Ignatius, To the Romans 3 (ANF 1, PDF p. 52), "that I may not merely be called a Christian, but really be found to be one."
  • Ignatius, To the Smyrnaeans 8 (ANF 1, PDF p. 62), "wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."

Aphorism: "The name came later. The thing came from him."

Aphorism: "Jesus never said 'Christian.' He said 'my church,' 'my blood,' and 'believe also in me.'"

Cross-examination

Questions to ask, in order, with the usual dodges and how to answer them.

  1. Do you agree that a group can exist before it has a name?
  2. Did Jesus gather disciples and appoint twelve of them?
  3. What did he mean by "I will build my church"?
  4. When he said "this cup is the new covenant in my blood... this do in remembrance of me," what was he asking his followers to do, and for how long?
  5. Who told the disciples to baptize the nations and teach his commands, if not Jesus?
  6. Which core feature of Christianity (baptism, the Lord's meal, the mission, faith in Jesus) came from someone other than Jesus, and from whom?
Dodge What it sounds like Reply
The late-insertion dodge "Those verses were added later by the church." Then the claim has changed from "Jesus never founded it" to "the Gospels are unreliable." Which verses, on what evidence, and why are the verses about Jesus being a Jewish teacher of love not also late?
The vocabulary dodge "He still never said 'Christian.'" Granted from the start. The question is the thing, not the word. Did he gather followers, give them a rite and send them out?
The "just a rabbi" dodge "Every rabbi had disciples." Which rabbi gave his students a covenant "in my blood," a rite to repeat in his memory, and a command to baptize all nations and teach his own commands?
The "only for Israel" dodge "He said he was sent only to Israel." Before the resurrection, yes (Matthew 15:24). After it, he sent the same men to "all the nations," "beginning from Jerusalem" (Luke 24:47). Israel first, then the world.
The corruption dodge "Look at what the church became." Agreed that much of it is corrupt. Corruption of a thing proves the thing existed. Measured against what standard? The one Jesus set.
The Paul dodge "Paul made it all up." Paul says he "received of the Lord" the meal he handed on, and the Gospels record the same acts without him. See the Paul defeater.

Connection to Scripture

See also

Common questions this page answers

Q: Did Jesus found Christianity?

Yes, in the sense that matters. He never used the word "Christian," which was first given to his disciples at Antioch (Acts 11:26). But he gathered disciples, appointed twelve, spoke of "my church," gave his followers a meal to keep in his memory as "the new covenant in my blood," and sent them to baptize and teach all nations. The name came later; the community came from him.

Q: Was Jesus a Jew or a Christian?

Jesus was a Jew, and the first Christians were Jews too. They believed he was Israel's Messiah, and Acts says many thousands of Jewish believers in Jerusalem stayed "zealous for the law" (Acts 21:20). For the first generation, "Jew or Christian" was a false choice. Christianity began as the faith of Jews who believed Israel's promises had been fulfilled in Jesus.

Q: Did Jesus ever use the word "Christian"?

No. The Greek word appears only three times in the New Testament (Acts 11:26, Acts 26:28, 1 Peter 4:16), all after his resurrection. Before that name was used, the disciples were simply disciples and the movement was called "the Way." The name identifies them by Jesus' title, Christ.

Q: Did Jesus mean to start a new religion?

He did not mean to start a religion with a new God. He worshipped the God of Israel and said he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17). But he did mean to build a community of his own followers, with a rite, a mission and a faith centered on himself ("believe in God, believe also in me," John 14:1). That community is what came to be called Christianity.

Q: Didn't Paul invent Christianity rather than Jesus?

No. Paul says he passed on the Lord's Supper as he "received of the Lord" (1 Corinthians 11:23), and the Gospels record the Twelve, the meal and the commission independently of him. The full answer is at Paul Invented Christianity Objection Defeater.

Q: How often does Jesus mention the church in the Gospels?

Rarely. The Greek word for church appears in only two Gospel verses, both in Matthew (Matthew 16:18 and Matthew 18:17). But the case that Jesus founded a community does not rest on that word. It rests on what he did: choosing the Twelve, giving the meal, commanding baptism and sending his followers to all nations.

Q: Isn't today's church far from what Jesus started?

Often, yes, and that should be admitted. But that is a charge of corruption, not proof that Jesus founded nothing. The complaint itself measures today's churches against a standard, what Jesus started, and that standard is the community, rite, mission and teaching recorded in the Gospels.