ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Lexicon

H6754 - tselem

Strong's: H6754 · BLB lookup Pronunciation: tseh'-lem Part of speech: masculine noun (probably from an unused root meaning "to shade / cast a shadow") Frequency: ~17 occurrences in the Hebrew Bible LXX equivalent: εἰκών (G1504 - eikon, "image") Aramaic cognate: צְלֵם (tselem, in the Aramaic of Daniel)

Semantic range (Brown-Driver-Briggs)

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

  1. Image, likeness, statue, a physical representation of something else, often an idol or a carved statue (Numbers 33:52; 1 Samuel 6:5, 11; 2 Kings 11:18; Ezekiel 7:20; 16:17; Amos 5:26; Daniel 2:31-35; 3:1-18).
  2. Image (as a representational pattern), the constitutive sense in Genesis 1.26-27, Genesis 5:3, Genesis 9.6, humanity made bə-tsalmēnu ("in our image"); Seth begotten bi-dmuto kə-tsalmo ("in his likeness, after his image").
  3. Phantom, shadow, illusion (rare, derived from the etymological "shadow" sense), Psalm 39:6 (ṣelem, "a mere phantom"); Psalm 73:20.

Theological force, imago Dei

Tselem is the technical OT noun for the image of God in humanity, the load-bearing lexeme of the doctrine of the imago Dei. It appears five times in three Genesis texts, and in each place is paired with H1823 - demuth (demuth, "likeness") so closely that the two words function as a single concept-cluster:

  • Genesis 1.26, "Let Us make man in Our tselem, according to Our demuth"
  • Genesis 1.27, bə-tselem used three times: "God created man in His own tselem, in the tselem of God He created him; male and female He created them"
  • Genesis 5:1-3, God made man bi-dmuth God; Seth was begotten bi-dmuth kə-tsalmo, humanity now reproduces its own image-bearing line
  • Genesis 9.6, the post-flood capital-punishment statute: "whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for in the tselem of God He made man"

The doctrinal claims compressed into the lexeme:

1. Universality. The imago is predicated of "ha-adam" (humanity / humankind), not of a sub-class. Male and female are both said in v. 27 to be created bə-tselem. This grounds equal human dignity across sex, race, age, and ability, a foundational point for Christian anthropology and ethics (cf. Christian Ethics).

2. Persistence after the Fall. Genesis 9.6 is decisive: God commands capital punishment for murder because the victim still bears the tselem, post-Eden. The image is marred but not erased by the Fall. This is the OT warrant for the patristic distinction (Irenaeus) between image (constitutive, retained) and likeness (dynamic, lost and to-be-restored).

3. Reproductive transmission. Genesis 5:3 states that Seth is begotten in Adam's likeness / image, humanity passes the imago down generationally. This is why the Genesis 9 statute applies to all post-flood humans, not only to the unfallen.

4. Ontological warrant for human dignity. The imago is the ground of the prohibition of bloodshed (Gen 9:6) and of the dignity of speech (James 3:9, "with [the tongue] we curse men, who have been made in the demuth of God"). The lexeme does ethical work: it is what makes murder a category-error against God, not merely against a fellow creature.

5. Christological convergence. The NT carries the imago doctrine forward via G1504 - eikon: Christ is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1.15; 2 Corinthians 4:4); humans are re-conformed to that image in sanctification (Romans 8:29; 2 Corinthians 3:18; Colossians 3:10). Christ is both the original imago (eternal Son) and the restored imago (incarnate model).

Idolatry, tselem as forbidden image

The same lexeme that names humanity-as-divine-image is the standard OT word for forbidden idolatrous images, a pointed irony the prophets exploit. Humanity is the only legitimate tselem of God; carved tselemim of pagan deities are precisely the inversion of the imago calling. The polemical contrast:

  • Numbers 33:52, destroy the tsalmōt (carved images) of the Canaanites upon entering the land
  • 1 Samuel 6:5, 11, the Philistines fashion tsalmē of the tumors and mice as a guilt offering
  • 2 Kings 11:18, Athaliah's Baal tsalmēhem are smashed
  • Ezekiel 7:20; 16:17, Israel makes tsalmē zakar (male images) for prostitution
  • Amos 5:26, "you carried Sikkuth your king and Kiyyun your tsalmēkem"
  • Daniel 2:31-35; 3:1-18, Nebuchadnezzar's vision-image and golden tselem (Aramaic), humanity setting up its own self-image as worship-object

The prophet's logic: the only authorized tselem of God is the human being. To carve another is to claim divine-image-making prerogative for oneself, which is idolatry. (This is also part of the OT warrant for the Decalogue's second commandment.)

Patristic / scholarly note

The Septuagint renders tselem with εἰκών (eikōn) and demuth with ὁμοίωσις (homoiōsis) in Genesis 1:26, the LXX rendering that licenses the patristic image / likeness distinction. Irenaeus (Against Heresies IV.16.2; V.6.1, c. AD 180) treats tselem / eikōn as the constitutive endowment retained after the Fall and demuth / homoiōsis as the dynamic Spirit-conformity that was lost and is restored in Christ. Athanasius (On the Incarnation 11-13, c. AD 318) takes the marring of the imago as the rationale for the Incarnation: only the original Image, becoming flesh, can re-stamp the marred image-bearers. Augustine (De Trinitate 12-14, c. AD 410) locates the imago in the soul's threefold structure (memory, intellect, will), reading bə-tsalmēnu (with the plural pronoun) as a Trinitarian signature.

Modern Hebrew scholarship (Westermann, Genesis 1-11; Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15; Middleton, The Liberating Image) has emphasized the royal-functional dimension: in Ancient Near Eastern texts, kings erect ṣalmu (Akkadian cognate) of themselves in subdued provinces to assert presence and authority. Genesis polemically democratizes this royal-imagery onto all humanity: every human (not just kings) is YHWH's representative-image deployed in the earth-province. This functional reading reinforces rather than displaces the ontological reading: the imago entails both constitution (what the human is) and vocation (what the human is for, to represent God's rule, Genesis 1:28).

In contemporary apologetics and ethics, the tselem doctrine is the foundation of pro-life argumentation (the unborn bear the imago), anti-discrimination argumentation (no human group is sub-imago), and the case against materialist anthropologies that reduce humans to their genetic substrate (Hoekema, Created in God's Image, 1986; Anthony Bradley; Carl Henry).

Verses in this codex

See Obsidian's backlinks pane for every verse page linking here. Top-cited references using tselem: Genesis 1.26, Genesis 1.27, Genesis 9.6.

See also