ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Lexicon

H3045 - yada

yada, yāḏaʿ, יָדַע, H3045, to know, knowledge, knowing

Strong's: H3045 · BLB lookup Pronunciation: yaw-dah' Part of speech: verb (Qal, Hiphil, Pual, Hophal, Hithpael) OT occurrences: ~947 Greek equivalent (LXX): ginōskō (G1097); occasionally eidō / oida (G1492)

Semantic range

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

Brands, events, influencers advertise here

The Hebrew yada spans a wide-relational sense of knowing, far beyond English "to know intellectually":

  1. Intellectual / propositional knowledge, knowing facts, information
  2. Experiential / participatory knowledge, knowing-by-experience
  3. Personal / relational knowledge, knowing-someone-personally
  4. Sexual intimacy (Genesis 4:1, Adam knew Eve his wife)
  5. Skill / expertise (Genesis 25:27, Esau "knew" hunting)
  6. Acknowledgment / recognition / approval in some contexts

The semantic range is integrated, Hebrew yada refuses the modern Western split between cognitive and relational knowing. To yada God is at once to know about Him and to know Him personally.

See this page's graph and discover linked topics

Theological force

Knowing God

The most theologically loaded use of yada is knowing God:

  • Hosea 6:6, "I delight in hesed rather than sacrifice, and in the da'at Elohim (knowledge of God) rather than burnt offerings"
  • Hosea 4:1, 6, "there is no emet, no hesed, no da'at Elohim in the land… My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge"
  • Jeremiah 9:23-24, "let him who boasts boast of this, that he understands and yada-s Me"
  • Jeremiah 22:16, "is not this what it means to yada-know Me?" (= caring for the poor)
  • Jeremiah 31:34, new covenant: "all… will know Me, from the least to the greatest"
  • Habakkuk 2:14, "the earth will be filled with the da'at of the glory of the LORD"

The pattern: yada God is the highest spiritual goal; lack of it is spiritual disaster; the new covenant's promise is universal knowledge of God.

Sexual intimacy

Yada is famously used for sexual intimacy:

The Hebrew euphemism captures the deep relational-experiential sense, sexual union is knowing in a profoundly personal-relational way.

God's yada of His people

  • Genesis 18:19, "I have yada-known Abraham"
  • Exodus 33:12, 17, "I have yada-known you by name"
  • Deuteronomy 34:10, Moses, "whom the LORD yada-knew face to face"
  • Psalm 1:6, "the LORD yada-knows the way of the righteous"
  • Psalm 139:1, 23, "O LORD, You have yada-searched me and yada-known me… search me, O God, and yada-know my heart"
  • Jeremiah 1:5, "before I formed you in the womb I yada-knew you"
  • Amos 3:2, "you only have I yada-known of all the families of the earth"

These uses of God's yada go beyond mere cognitive awareness, they signal covenantal-personal relationship. To be yada-known by God is to be elected, loved, in relationship.

The NT parallel: Galatians 4:9, "having gnontes God, or rather, having been gnōsthentes by God"; 1 Corinthians 8:3, "if anyone loves God, he is egnōstai hyp' autou, known by Him."

Genesis 3, the tree of yada of tov v'ra

The Fall narrative engages yada directly:

  • Genesis 2:9, 17, etz ha-da'at tov va-ra, tree of the knowledge of good and evil
  • Genesis 3:5, the serpent: "you will be like God, yodei tov va-ra"
  • Genesis 3:7, 22, humans now know good and evil (with the corrupting consequence)

The Fall is humanity grasping at autonomous moral yada, to determine good and evil independently of God.

The verb choice is itself an argument. If the author of Genesis wanted to say Adam gained wisdom or intellectual mastery, Hebrew had a whole wisdom vocabulary available: chakam (be wise, the standard wisdom verb), bin (understand, discern, as in 1 Kings 3:9), sakal (have insight, act wisely). Genesis 3:22 uses none of them. It says Adam became one who yada-knows good and evil, the broadest and most experiential of the knowing-verbs, the same verb used of Adam knowing Eve one chapter later. The narrative confirms the experiential sense at Genesis 3:7: their eyes were opened and they "knew that they were naked," not a new fact but a new experience of shame. Augustine drew the mode-distinction that follows: God knows evil as the physician knows disease, as Judge; fallen man knows evil as the patient suffers it. Same verb, different mode of knowing. This grounds the patristic answer to the "God admitted the serpent was right" objection; see Genesis 3.22 and Tree of Knowledge Objection.

Apologetic / epistemological significance

Yada anchors:

  1. Christian epistemology, knowing-God is integrated relational-cognitive, not bifurcated
  2. The relational nature of biblical truth, knowledge of God (vs knowledge about God)
  3. Sexual ethics, sex as relational-personal knowing, not casual physicality
  4. Election / covenant, God's yada of His people grounds salvation
  5. The new covenant promise, universal knowledge of God in the eschaton
  6. Anti-modern-Western-rationalism, biblical knowledge is relational, not detached

Notable verses

Knowing God

God's knowing

Knowledge / wisdom contrast

Sexual intimacy

Patristic / scholarly note

Patristic engagement: Augustine (De Trinitate) on the relation between cognitive cogitatio and contemplative visio Dei. The mystical / contemplative tradition (Bernard of Clairvaux; Bonaventure; Teresa of Avila) develops knowing God in the depth-relational sense.

Modern Christian engagement:

  • J. I. Packer (Knowing God, 1973), the classic devotional treatment
  • Kevin Vanhoozer (Is There a Meaning in This Text?, 1998), biblical hermeneutics
  • John Frame (The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God, 1987), Reformed epistemology

See also

Notes

Lexical workspace for yada.