ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Passage

Genesis 50.20

Book: Genesis · NASB95

Verse

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

"As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive." (Genesis 50:20, NASB95)

Immediate context (±2 verses)

NASB95 (NASB95)

"Then his brothers also came and fell down before him and said, 'Behold, we are your servants.' But Joseph said to them, 'Do not be afraid, for am I in God's place?"

"As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive."

"So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.' So he comforted them and spoke kindly to them. Now Joseph stayed in Egypt, he and his father's household, and Joseph lived one hundred and ten years." (Genesis 50:18-22, NASB95)

Setting

  • Speaker: Joseph, son of Jacob, prime minister of Egypt under Pharaoh, addressing his brothers after their father Jacob's death.
  • Audience: Joseph's eleven brothers, Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Benjamin, fearful that with their father dead, Joseph will now retaliate for the betrayal of Genesis 37 (Joseph sold to slave-traders for 20 shekels of silver, faked-his-death to Jacob).
  • Location: Egypt, Goshen and the Egyptian royal court (the brothers had relocated their families to Goshen during the famine, Gen 47).
  • Time period: Patriarchal narrative period; the literary setting is post-Jacob's-death (c. mid-2nd millennium BC on conservative dating; chronologically uncertain on critical dating). The verse is the theological climax of the Joseph cycle (Gen 37-50), which itself functions as the structural and thematic culmination of Genesis, the unresolved-promise of Gen 12:3 (universal blessing through Abraham's seed) finds its first major demonstration in Joseph's preservation of his family + the surrounding nations during the seven-year famine. The Joseph narrative is the longest-sustained character study in the Pentateuch (14 chapters).

Theological reading

1. The double-intentionality formula, the structural climax of Genesis

The verse contains the most concentrated providence-theology formula in the OT: attem chashabtem alay raah, elohim chashabah letovah, "YOU meant evil against me, GOD meant it for good." The Hebrew uses the same verb (chashav, "to think / plan / intend / purpose") for both human and divine intention, but with diametrically-opposite content. The brothers' purpose was raah ("evil"); God's purpose was tovah ("good"). The verb-repetition is theologically deliberate: the same event under the same verb-structure carries two intentionalities at once.

This is the classic compatibilist providence text. Human moral agency (the brothers genuinely intend evil; their guilt is real, hence Joseph's "do not be afraid", they have something to fear apart from this) and divine sovereign purpose (God genuinely intends good through the same event) are both fully real and operative. The text doesn't dissolve human-agency into divine-puppetry; nor does it reduce divine-providence to ex-post-facto rationalization. Both are simultaneously true.

2. Lema'an asoh kayyom hazzeh, "in order to bring about this present result"

The purpose-clause lema'an asoh kayyom hazzeh + lehachayot am-rav ("in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive") specifies the providential outcome. The "many people" includes (a) Jacob's family (the seed of the Abrahamic covenant, preservation of the covenant line), (b) Egypt (the nation that received Joseph's 7-year-grain-storage policy and survived the famine), and (c) the surrounding ANE peoples who came to Egypt for grain (Gen 41:57). The Joseph narrative thereby fulfills Gen 12:3 in seed-form, Abraham's seed becomes a blessing to the nations, not just to Israel.

3. Joseph as Christ-typological figure

The patristic + medieval + Reformation reading consistently sees Joseph as a type of Christ: beloved son of the Father (Gen 37:3 → Mt 3:17); sold for silver by his brothers (Gen 37:28 → Mt 26:15); falsely accused (Gen 39 → Mt 26:59-60); wrongful imprisonment (Gen 39:20 → Christ's arrest + trial); raised to glory after suffering (Gen 41:40-44 → Phil 2:8-11); becomes the savior of his brothers through what they meant for evil (Gen 50:20 → Acts 2:23 + 4:27-28 "they did to Him what God's hand had purposed beforehand"); forgives the brothers (Gen 50:19-21 → Lk 23:34). The typology is reception-history-rooted in the apostolic period (Acts 7:9-16 Stephen's speech narrates the Joseph cycle Christologically).

4. Apologetic + theodicy load, the load-bearing OT-providence-theodicy text

Genesis 50:20 is the load-bearing OT proof-text for Christian providence-doctrine + theodicy answer to the Problem of Evil. The verse establishes the canonical pattern: God's permission of human evil is not divine evil; God's sovereign purpose works through human evil to bring about good without endorsing the evil. The felix culpa tradition (Augustine / Aquinas / Anselm / Luther / Calvin / van Inwagen / Plantinga's free-will-defense / Stump Wandering in Darkness 2010) all build on this structural logic. The cross is the supreme application: human evil (Judas's betrayal + Sanhedrin condemnation + Roman crucifixion) becomes God's instrument of salvation (Acts 2:23 explicitly applies Gen 50:20 logic, "this Man, delivered up by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men"). The verse's POE-force: evil is compatible with sovereign-good-purpose, not because evil isn't really evil, but because God's sovereignty is large enough to include evil within a redemptive arc producing greater good than would have been possible without the permission. Not Leibnizian "best-of-all-possible-worlds" optimism but the more modest claim that God's providence works through evil's permission to vindicate the permission.

5. Patristic + Reformation reception

Augustine De Civ. Dei 14.27 + Enchiridion 11, classical felix culpa framework (God permits evil because He can produce greater good through its overcoming); Chrysostom Hom. on Genesis 67; Aquinas ST I q.22 + q.49 + I-II q.79 a.1, Gen 50:20 anchors the concursus doctrine (God concurs in being-of-action without concurring in moral-defect); Luther Lectures on Genesis (1535-45), load-bearing for opus alienum doctrine; Calvin Inst. 1.18.4 cites Gen 50:20: "the same work, in respect that it is done by God, is praised, and in respect that it is done by men, is condemned"; Westminster Confession 5.4 (1646), canonical Reformed providence-statement. Modern: Plantinga God, Freedom, and Evil (1974); Eleonore Stump Wandering in Darkness (2010, extended Joseph-as-theodicy-paradigm); Christopher Wright The God I Don't Understand (2008); D. A. Carson How Long, O Lord? (1990); Tim Keller Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering (2013).

Key words (Hebrew)

  • chashav (H2803, "to think / plan / intend / purpose / reckon"), used identically for both human and divine intentionality in v. 20; the verb-repetition is theologically deliberate. Same root underlies machashabah "thought / plan / purpose" (cf. Prov 16:3 machshebot + Jer 29:11, God's plans / purposes vocabulary).
  • raah (H7451, "evil / harm / calamity") vs tovah (H2896, "good / well-being / prosperity"), the antithetical pairing the verse holds in tension. Same verb (chashav) yields opposite intended outcomes.
  • lema'an (H4616, "in order that / for the purpose of"), purpose-conjunction; introduces the divine-providential outcome-clause.
  • lehachayot (from H2421 chayah hiphil, "to preserve alive / cause to live") + am-rav ("many people / a great people"), the salvific-outcome vocabulary; same verb-family underlies later resurrection-life and salvific-preservation passages.

Cross-references

  • Acts 2:23, "this Man, delivered up by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men", direct NT application of Gen 50:20 logic to the cross
  • Acts 4:27-28, "truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus... to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose predestined to occur"
  • Romans 8:28, "God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose", Pauline expansion of the Gen 50:20 framework
  • Genesis 45:5-8, Joseph's earlier statement of the same theology to his brothers in their first reunion: "God sent me before you to preserve a remnant in the earth"
  • Proverbs 16:9, "the mind of man plans his way, but the LORD directs his steps", wisdom-tradition compatibilist parallel (see Proverbs 16.3)
  • Isaiah 10:5-15, YHWH using Assyria as instrument of judgment then judging Assyria for the brutality with which it executed the judgment, same providence-without-divine-endorsement-of-evil logic
  • Jeremiah 29:11, "For I know the plans (machshebot) that I have for you... plans for welfare and not for calamity", same chashav-root vocabulary

Quoted in

See also

  • Problem of Evil, load-bearing companion concept hub; Gen 50:20 is the canonical OT theodicy proof-text
  • Foreknowledge vs Causation, divine-providence concept hub; compatibilist anthropology grounded
  • Hardening Pharaohs Heart, sister OT-providence-with-human-agency text
  • Romans 8.1, Pauline parallel: no condemnation in Christ; cf. Rom 8:28's expansion
  • Augustine De Civ. Dei 14.27 + Enchiridion 11, the classical felix culpa framework
  • Calvin Inst. 1.18.4, "the same work, in respect that it is done by God, is praised, and in respect that it is done by men, is condemned"

Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB), Copyright © 1960, 1971, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org