ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Passage

Ezra 2.58

Book: Ezra · NASB95

Immediate context (±2 verses)

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

Brands, events, influencers advertise here

ASV

56. the children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel, 57. the children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth-hazzebaim, the children of Ami.

58. All the Nethinim, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.

  1. And these were they that went up from Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Cherub, Addan, and Immer; but they could not show their fathers' houses, and their seed, whether they were of Israel: 60. the children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred fifty and two. (Ezra 2:56-60, ASV)
WEB

56. the children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel, 57. the children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth Hazzebaim, the children of Ami.

58. All the temple servants, and the children of Solomon’s servants, were three hundred ninety-two.

  1. These were those who went up from Tel Melah, Tel Harsha, Cherub, Addan, and Immer; but they could not show their fathers’ houses, and their offspring, whether they were of Israel: 60. the children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred fifty-two. (Ezra 2:56-60, WEB)
KJV

56. The children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel, 57. The children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth of Zebaim, the children of Ami. Ami: or, Amon

58. All the Nethinims, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.

  1. And these were they which went up from Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan, and Immer: but they could not shew their father's house, and their seed, whether they were of Israel: Addan: or, Addon seed: or, pedigree 60. The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred fifty and two. (Ezra 2:56-60, KJV)
YLT

56. Sons of Jaalah, sons of Darkon, sons of Giddel, 57. Sons of Shephatiah, sons of Hattil, sons of Pochereth of Zebaim, sons of Ami.

58. All the Nethinim, and the sons of the servants of Solomon [are] three hundred ninety and two.

  1. And these [are] those going up from Tel-Melah, Tel-Harsa, Cherub, Addan, Immer, and they have not been able to declare the house of their fathers, and their seed, whether they [are] of Israel: 60. sons of Delaiah, sons of Tobiah, sons of Nekoda, six hundred fifty and two. (Ezra 2:56-60, YLT)

Setting

  • Speaker: TBD
  • Audience: TBD
  • Location: TBD
  • Time period: TBD

Theological reading

Patristic / early-church-father exegesis, to be added.

Key words

Theologically-loaded Greek or Hebrew words in this verse may have entries in the lexicon. Curated to roughly 100 contested terms across the corpus, not every word.

Quoted in

Concepts:

Notes

Your annotations.

Why these four translations

ris3n chose ASV, WEB, KJV, and YLT for two reasons together. They are the most literal English translations available (formal-equivalence: word-for-word renderings that preserve the Hebrew and Greek grammar rather than smoothing it into modern dynamic-equivalence idiom). And they are in the public domain in the United States, which means fair-use quotation at any length requires no publisher license. Modern licensed translations (NASB95, ESV, NIV) restrict volume of quotation under their copyright terms, so they are not used at stub-level coverage here. NASB95 appears only on hand-curated rich passage hubs under Lockman Foundation's fair-use allowance.

The four:

  • ASV (American Standard Version, 1901). The basis of the modern critical-text English tradition.
  • WEB (World English Bible, contemporary). Public-domain revision in the ASV line, in current English.
  • KJV (King James Version, 1611). Reformation-era, Textus Receptus base.
  • YLT (Young's Literal Translation, Robert Young, 1862). Hyper-literal preservation of Hebrew and Greek grammar; useful for word-study work even where English reads stiff.

See Bibles for the full per-translation history, translators, textual basis, strengths, and weaknesses.