ris3n's Apologetics Codex

Concept

Babylonian Chronicle and the Capture of Jerusalem

Babylonian Chronicle, Jerusalem Chronicle, Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle, Chronicle of the Early Years of Nebuchadnezzar, ABC 5, BM 21946, Chronicle 5, Babylonian Chronicle 597 BC

Intro

There are ads on our codex that pay for hosting and keep the codex free. If you can, please consider whitelisting ris3n.com or allowing scripts to support the work.

Sponsored

Brands, events, influencers advertise here

The Bible says that Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, besieged Jerusalem, took the young king Jehoiachin away to Babylon, and put the king's uncle Zedekiah on the throne in his place (2 Kings 24:10-17). For a long time that story was known only from the Bible and from later writers who depended on it.

Then a small clay tablet in the British Museum was published in 1956. It is a Babylonian court chronicle, a dry year-by-year record kept by Babylon's own scribes. For Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year it says that the king marched west, besieged "the city of Judah," captured it on a named day, seized its king, and set up a king of his own choice. That is the same event the Bible describes, told from the other side, by the people who did it.

The tablet does not prove that God spoke through Jeremiah or that the Bible is inspired. What it does show is that the biblical account of 597 BC gets the event, the people, and the outcome right, and it lets historians date the fall of Jerusalem to the day.

In full

The Chronicle of the Early Years of Nebuchadnezzar (British Museum BM 21946; text 5 in A. K. Grayson's standard edition, hence "ABC 5"; often called the Jerusalem Chronicle) is a Neo-Babylonian cuneiform tablet in the Babylonian Chronicle series. It records the closing campaign of Nabopolassar and the first years of Nebuchadnezzar II, from the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC to his eleventh year (594/593 BC). D. J. Wiseman first published it in Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626-556 B.C.) in the British Museum (1956). The entry for year seven (598/597 BC) reports the siege and capture of Jerusalem on 2 Adar, which Wiseman equated with 15/16 March 597 BC, the capture of its king, and the installation of a replacement king. This is the Babylonian side of 2 Kings 24:10-17, 2 Chronicles 36:9-10, and Jeremiah 52:28.

The object and its discovery

  • What it is. A clay tablet written in Babylonian cuneiform, one of a series of chronicle tablets that summarize each year of a reign in short, unembellished entries: where the king marched, what he captured, when he came home.
  • Where it came from. Like most of the Babylonian Chronicles, it reached the British Museum through the antiquities market rather than from a recorded excavation. Wiseman judged the provenance of these chronicles to be Babylon, from the internal evidence of the texts and from the other tablets acquired with them.
  • When it was read. It sat in the museum's collection for decades before Wiseman identified and published it in 1956, together with other chronicles covering the end of Assyria and the rise of Babylon. Siegfried Horn noted in 1967 that before these publications almost no historical (as opposed to building) records of Nebuchadnezzar's 43-year reign were known.
  • Where it is now. The British Museum, London, museum number 21946.

What it says

The year-seven entry, in Grayson's translation as presented by Livius.org, reads:

"In the seventh year, the month of Kislîmu, the king of Akkad mustered his troops, marched to the Hatti-land, and besieged the city of Judah and on the second day of the month of Addaru he seized the city and captured the king. He appointed there a king of his own choice, received its heavy tribute and sent to Babylon." (Reverse, lines 11-13)

"King of Akkad" is Nebuchadnezzar's title as king of Babylonia. "Hatti-land" is the Babylonian term for Syria and the Levant. "The city of Judah" is Jerusalem. The chronicle names neither the captured king nor his replacement.

The same tablet also records the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC (compare Jeremiah 46:2), Nabopolassar's death and Nebuchadnezzar's accession, the yearly campaigns in "Hatti," and a costly clash with Egypt in 601 BC, after which Nebuchadnezzar spent a year rebuilding his chariot forces.

The biblical match

2 Kings 24 tells the same story in more detail:

"At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up to Jerusalem, and the city was besieged. And Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came unto the city, while his servants were besieging it; and Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, he, and his mother, and his servants, and his princes, and his officers: and the king of Babylon took him in the eighth year of his reign." (2 Kings 24:10-12, ASV)

"And the king of Babylon made Mattaniah, Jehoiachin's father's brother, king is his stead, and changed his name to Zedekiah." (2 Kings 24:17, ASV)

The Chronicler gives the short version: "And at the return of the year king Nebuchadnezzar sent, and brought him to Babylon, with the goodly vessels of the house of Jehovah, and made Zedekiah his brother king over Judah and Jerusalem." (2 Chronicles 36:10, ASV)

Point by point:

Detail Babylonian Chronicle Bible
Who attacked The king of Akkad (Nebuchadnezzar) in person Nebuchadnezzar came while his servants besieged the city (2 Kings 24:11)
Target "The city of Judah" Jerusalem
Outcome City seized, king captured Jehoiachin surrendered and was taken (2 Kings 24:12)
Replacement "A king of his own choice" Mattaniah, renamed Zedekiah (2 Kings 24:17)
Plunder Heavy tribute sent to Babylon Temple and palace treasures carried off (2 Kings 24:13)
Timing Year 7, month Adar (late winter 597 BC) "At the return of the year" (2 Chronicles 36:10); "the seventh year" (Jeremiah 52:28)

The seventh year and the eighth year

The Chronicle puts the capture in Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year. Jeremiah 52:28 agrees: "This is the people whom Nebuchadrezzar carried away captive: in the seventh year three thousand Jews and three and twenty" (ASV). But 2 Kings 24:12 says Jehoiachin was taken "in the eighth year of his reign."

This is a real difference, and it has a standard explanation. Siegfried Horn (1967) argued that the writers of Kings and Chronicles counted regnal years on Judah's autumn-to-autumn civil calendar, while the Babylonians counted from the spring. On that reckoning Nebuchadnezzar's years in Kings run one number ahead of the Babylonian count for part of each year, so a capture in Adar 597 falls in his eighth year by Judean reckoning and his seventh by Babylonian reckoning. Wiseman also observed that the deportation itself began "at the turn of the year," in the month after the city fell, which was the start of Nebuchadnezzar's eighth Babylonian year. Either way the two numbers describe the same weeks in early 597 BC; they are not two different events.

What it does and does not prove

What it confirms:

  1. The event. A Babylonian siege and capture of Jerusalem in Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year, led by the king himself, is now attested by Babylon's own records.
  2. The political outcome. The king of Judah was removed and a Babylonian-appointed king installed, exactly the Jehoiachin-to-Zedekiah transition of 2 Kings 24:17.
  3. The date. Wiseman wrote that the date of this conquest was "now known precisely for the first time," 2 Adar, or 15/16 March 597 BC. Few events in the Old Testament can be dated this exactly, and the date anchors the chronology of the last kings of Judah, Ezekiel's dated oracles (which count from Jehoiachin's exile), and the start of the Babylonian exile.
  4. Accurate biblical framing. The Babylonian chronicle and the biblical historian were written by opposite parties for opposite purposes, one a royal record of conquest, the other a prophetic history of judgment. They agree on the substance.

What it does not show:

  • It does not name Jehoiachin, Zedekiah, or Jerusalem. The identification rests on the date, the place ("the city of Judah"), and the sequence, which leave no realistic alternative, but the names come from the Bible.
  • It says nothing about the prophetic and theological claims of the narrative: that the exile was the LORD's judgment (2 Kings 24:13, "as Jehovah had said"), or that Jeremiah had foretold it. Archaeology can confirm that an event happened; it cannot confirm why God allowed it.
  • It does not record the numbers deported. The biblical figures (ten thousand in 2 Kings 24:14; 3,023 in Jeremiah 52:28) are not checked by this tablet.
  • It does not cover the final destruction of 587/586 BC. The surviving chronicle tablet ends with Nebuchadnezzar's eleventh year, and no chronicle for the later years has been found.

Evidential status

Well-established mainstream consensus. The tablet's authenticity, reading, and date are not disputed, and its identification with the 597 BC capture of Jerusalem recorded in 2 Kings is standard in Assyriology and biblical history alike. The only live discussion is the calendar question behind the seventh-year and eighth-year numbering, which concerns how ancient scribes counted years, not whether the event happened.

See also

Common questions this page answers

Q: What is the Babylonian Chronicle that mentions Jerusalem?

It is a small cuneiform tablet in the British Museum (BM 21946, known as ABC 5 or the Jerusalem Chronicle) that records the first eleven years of Nebuchadnezzar II's reign. Its entry for his seventh year reports that he besieged "the city of Judah," captured it on 2 Adar, seized its king, and appointed a king of his own choice. D. J. Wiseman published it in 1956.

Q: Does the Babylonian Chronicle confirm the Bible?

It confirms the event recorded in 2 Kings 24:10-17: Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem, took its king, and installed a replacement, which the Bible identifies as Jehoiachin being exiled and his uncle Mattaniah being renamed Zedekiah. It does not name those kings, and it cannot confirm the Bible's theological explanation of the exile, but on the historical facts the two independent sources agree.

Q: What exact date did Jerusalem fall in 597 BC?

The Chronicle gives the second day of the month Adar in Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year. Wiseman equated this with 15/16 March 597 BC. It is one of the most precisely dated events in the Old Testament.

Q: Why does 2 Kings say the eighth year when the Chronicle says the seventh?

The difference comes from calendar reckoning, not from two different events. Siegfried Horn (1967) argued that the writers of Kings counted years on Judah's autumn-to-autumn calendar, which runs a year ahead of the Babylonian spring-to-spring count for part of the year. Jeremiah 52:28 uses the Babylonian-style "seventh year" for the same deportation.

Q: Where is the Babylonian Chronicle of Jerusalem today?

In the British Museum in London, museum number 21946. It came to the museum through the antiquities market, so its exact findspot is unknown; Wiseman judged it to come from Babylon.