Passage
1 Corinthians 15.3-4
Book: 1 Corinthians · NASB95
Verse
Sponsored
"For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures." (1 Corinthians 15:3-4, NASB95)
Immediate context (±2 verses)
NASB95 (NASB95)
"1. Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2. by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain."
"3. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4. and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,"
"5. and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep;" (1 Corinthians 15:1-6, NASB95)
Setting
- Speaker: Paul, writing to the Corinthian church c. AD 53-55 from Ephesus during his third missionary journey.
- Audience: the Corinthian Christians, a Greek-speaking church Paul founded c. AD 50-52, now confused about whether the dead are raised at all (1 Cor 15:12) and skeptical of bodily resurrection in particular (Greek philosophical context: dualistic-spiritualist anthropology resists sōma resurrection).
- Location: Paul writing from Ephesus, Asia Minor.
- Time period: Letter c. AD 53-55, but the creed itself is much older. Paul uses technical rabbinic transmission vocabulary (paredōka "I delivered" + parelabon "I received"; the verbal pair denotes formal tradition-handover) signaling that he is reciting fixed catechetical material received at his conversion / discipleship in Damascus and Jerusalem (c. AD 33-36, within 3-6 years of the crucifixion). Gary Habermas + Larry Hurtado + N. T. Wright + Richard Bauckham converge on dating the creed itself to AD 30-36, making it the earliest extant Christian confession, predating any written gospel by decades.
Theological reading
1. The pre-Pauline creed, earliest Christian confession
The pair paredōka / parelabon is Pharisaic-rabbinic transmission vocabulary (cf. Pirkē Avot 1:1 qibbel / māsar) marking Paul as relaying received tradition rather than composing fresh content. Semitic features (parallelism, four hoti-clauses, non-Pauline diction) argue for Aramaic / Palestinian origin. Paul received the creed at his conversion (c. AD 33) and Jerusalem visit with Peter and James (c. AD 36, Gal 1:18-19), then handed it to the Corinthians (c. AD 50-52). The creed is therefore dated 3-6 years post-crucifixion, eliminating the "legendary development" hypothesis (legends require generations, not years; cf. A. N. Sherwin-White Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament 1963).
Four hoti-clauses: (1) Christ died for our sins (substitutionary atonement); (2) was buried (genuine death, anti-Docetic; corpse-disposal historically locatable); (3) was raised on the third day (bodily, dated); (4) appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve (vv. 5-6 extending to enumerated witnesses).
2. "According to the Scriptures", kata tas graphas
The double kata tas graphas (vv. 3 and 4) frames Christ's death and resurrection as fulfillment of OT prophecy, not ad-hoc historical events. Likely-targeted texts: Isa 53:5-12 (Servant Song vicarious suffering, see Isaiah 53.5 / Isaiah 53.12); Ps 16:10 (Acts 2:25-31; 13:35); Hos 6:2 (third-day resurrection idiom); Jonah 1:17 / Mt 12:40 typology; Dan 9:26-27; Zech 12:10 + 13:7. Early kerygma reads the OT prospectively-Christologically (cf. Lk 24:26-27, 44-47).
3. Substitutionary atonement, hyper tōn hamartiōn hēmōn
The first clause uses hyper + genitive ("for / on behalf of our sins"), vicarious-substitutionary force. Paul develops this across the corpus (Rom 3:25-26 hilastērion; Rom 5:8; 2 Cor 5:21; Gal 3:13; 1 Tim 2:6 antilytron). The formula stands behind every NT atonement tradition (ransom Mk 10:45; penal-substitution Rom 3:25 + Gal 3:13; Christus Victor Col 2:14-15; satisfaction Heb 9:12-14). Critically: this is pre-Pauline received tradition, so substitutionary atonement is not a late doctrinal development but the earliest layer of Christian confession.
4. Bodily resurrection, egēgertai perfect-passive
Egēgertai (perfect-passive of egeirō) is Paul's signature resurrection-vocabulary; the Greek perfect denotes completed-past-action-with-continuing-present-effect ("raised and remains raised"). Paul uses it 16× (1 Cor 15:4, 12-20; Rom 4:25; 2 Tim 2:8; etc.). Bodily, not merely spiritual: "buried" (v. 4) implies a corpse to be raised; the vv. 5-7 appearances are physical encounters; vv. 35-44 explicitly addresses the resurrection-body as sōma pneumatikon (Spirit-animated body, not non-bodily spirit per N. T. Wright Resurrection of the Son of God 2003).
5. The "third day", historical-prophetic specification
Tē hēmera tē tritē is locatable historical claim plus prophetic-fulfillment marker. Friday crucifixion → Sunday discovery counting inclusively per Jewish reckoning. Prophetically: Hos 6:2 + Jonah 1:17 + Mt 12:40. The specification cannot be reduced to metaphor; the creed treats it as fixed historical datum AND Scripture-fulfilling event.
6. Apologetic load, minimal-facts foundation
The creed is the load-bearing anchor for the Habermas-Licona minimal-facts apologetic (The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus 2004). Habermas's 30-year NT-scholarship survey (1975-2005, ~3,400 publications) documents broad consensus, including from skeptical scholars (Bart Ehrman, Gerd Lüdemann, Reginald Fuller, Joachim Jeremias, James D. G. Dunn), on the creed's authenticity and pre-Pauline dating. Five facts emerge with broad scholarly acceptance: Jesus died by crucifixion; the disciples believed they saw the risen Jesus (~95% acceptance); Paul's conversion; James's conversion; the empty tomb (~75%). The 1 Cor 15:3-7 creed is the primary documentary source. The dispute is therefore not over the data but over its interpretation (hallucination / mass-delusion / conspiracy, all defeated by additional considerations, see Argument from the Resurrection).
7. Patristic + Reformation reception
Ignatius of Antioch Trallians 9 (c. AD 110) cites the death-burial-resurrection sequence as anti-Docetic creed; Tertullian De Resurrectione Carnis (c. AD 210) builds the anti-Gnostic case for bodily resurrection from this core; Athanasius De Incarnatione 21-32 (c. AD 318) takes 1 Cor 15:3-4 as the Christological-soteriological-eschatological hinge; Augustine Enchiridion 84-89 + De Civ. Dei 22; Aquinas ST III q.53-56 + supplement q.75-86 (magisterial scholastic resurrection-treatment); Luther Lectures on 1 Corinthians 15 (1532-33); Calvin Comm. on 1 Cor 15 + Inst. 3.25, "the resurrection of Christ is the chief article of our faith." Modern: N. T. Wright Resurrection of the Son of God (2003); Gary Habermas (30-year survey + minimal-facts framework); Michael Licona Resurrection of Jesus (2010); Richard Bauckham Jesus and the Eyewitnesses (2006/2017); Larry Hurtado Lord Jesus Christ (2003); Joachim Jeremias Eucharistic Words of Jesus (1966, pre-Pauline tradition methodology).
Key words (Greek)
- paredōka (G3860 paradidōmi, "to deliver / hand over"), technical rabbinic transmission vocabulary, paired with parelabon (G3880 paralambanō, "to receive"); the pair signals fixed catechetical-creedal handover, NOT free composition. Same vocabulary in 1 Cor 11:23 (Eucharist tradition) and Mark 7:4 (Pharisaic-tradition transmission).
- egēgertai (G1453 egeirō perfect-passive, "has been raised"), the resurrection-verb of choice across Pauline corpus; perfect tense denotes completed-past-action-with-continuing-present-effect ("raised and remains raised"). Bodily-resurrection vocabulary; cf. v. 20's aparchē "firstfruits."
- hyper (G5228, "for / on behalf of / instead of"), substitutionary preposition + genitive; the atonement-grammar of 1 Cor 15:3 + Rom 5:8 + 2 Cor 5:21 + Gal 3:13.
- kata tas graphas ("according to the Scriptures"), the prophetic-fulfillment marker, doubled at vv. 3 and 4; targets Isa 53 + Ps 16:10 + Hos 6:2 + Jonah 1:17 + Dan 9:26 + Zech 12:10.
Cross-references
- Isaiah 53:5-12, Servant Song; the OT kata tas graphas anchor for "Christ died for our sins" (see Isaiah 53.5 / Isaiah 53.12)
- Psalm 16:10, "You will not abandon my soul to Sheol"; cited Acts 2:25-31, 13:35
- Hosea 6:2 + Jonah 1:17 + Matthew 12:40, third-day resurrection-prophecy anchors
- Romans 4:25, "delivered for our transgressions, raised for our justification", Pauline expansion
- Romans 10:9-10, kerygmatic confession parallel
- 2 Timothy 2:8, "Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead", credal parallel
- Acts 2:22-36 / Acts 13:28-39, Petrine + Pauline kerygma sermons; same sequence
- 1 Corinthians 11:23, paired paredōka / parelabon (Eucharist tradition); confirms the technical-tradition reading
Quoted in
- 2 Corinthians 5.21
- Acts 1.3
- Argument from Prophecy Fulfillment
- Argument from the Resurrection
- Argument from Twin Asymmetries
- Crucifixion Denial Refutation
- Flood Genocide Objection Defeater
- G1453 - egeiro
- Galatians 3.13
- Gospel
- Jesus
- log
- Resurrection of Jesus - Minimal Facts Case
- Resurrection of the Body
See also
- Argument from the Resurrection, the anchor apologetic syllogism; uses the creed as foundational data
- Crucifixion Denial Refutation, defeater for "Jesus didn't die" objection; pairs with this verse's apethanen
- 1 Corinthians 15, chapter-level book hub; the whole-chapter resurrection treatise
- Habermas + Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (2004), minimal-facts apologetic framework built on 1 Cor 15:3-7
Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB), Copyright © 1960, 1971, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org