# John 15.26

<!-- type: passage | created: 2026-05-06 | updated: 2026-05-25 -->


**Book:** [John](/codex/john-the-apostle/) · ASV / WEB / KJV / YLT

## Verse

**ASV:**
> 26. <span class="rl-speech">But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall bear witness of me:</span> (John 15:26, ASV)

**WEB:**
> 26. <span class="rl-speech">“When the Counselor has come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will testify about me.</span> (John 15:26, WEB)

**KJV:**
> 26. <span class="rl-speech">But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:</span> (John 15:26, KJV)

**YLT:**
> 26. <span class="rl-speech">'And when the Comforter may come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who from the Father doth come forth, he will testify of me;</span> (John 15:26, YLT)

## Immediate context (±2 verses)

**ASV:**
> 24. <span class="rl-speech">If I had not done among them the works which none other did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.</span> 25. <span class="rl-speech">But this cometh to pass, that the word may be fulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me without a cause.</span> 26. <span class="rl-speech">But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall bear witness of me:</span> 27. <span class="rl-speech">and ye also bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning.</span> (John 15:24-27, ASV)

**WEB:**
> 24. <span class="rl-speech">If I hadn’t done among them the works which no one else did, they wouldn’t have had sin. But now have they seen and also hated both me and my Father.</span> 25. <span class="rl-speech">But this happened so that the word may be fulfilled which was written in their law, ‘They hated me without a cause.’</span> 26. <span class="rl-speech">“When the Counselor has come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will testify about me.</span> 27. <span class="rl-speech">You will also testify, because you have been with me from the beginning.</span> (John 15:24-27, WEB)

**KJV:**
> 24. <span class="rl-speech">If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.</span> 25. <span class="rl-speech">But this cometh to pass, that the word might be fulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me without a cause.</span> 26. <span class="rl-speech">But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:</span> 27. <span class="rl-speech">And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning.</span> (John 15:24-27, KJV)

**YLT:**
> 24. <span class="rl-speech">if I did not do among them the works that no other hath done, they were not having sin, and now they have both seen and hated both me and my Father;</span> 25. <span class="rl-speech">but, that the word may be fulfilled that was written in their law, They hated me without a cause.</span> 26. <span class="rl-speech">'And when the Comforter may come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who from the Father doth come forth, he will testify of me;</span> 27. <span class="rl-speech">and ye also do testify, because from the beginning ye are with me.</span> (John 15:24-27, YLT)

## Setting

- **Speaker:** Jesus, in the Upper Room Discourse (John 13:31-16:33), specifically within the vine-and-branches → world-hates-you → Spirit-coming sequence
- **Audience:** the eleven disciples (Judas Iscariot has already left, John 13:30)
- **Location:** Jerusalem, the upper room of the Last Supper (or possibly en route to Gethsemane, *"Arise, let us go hence"* of John 14:31 raises the staging question)
- **Time period:** the night before the crucifixion, c. Nisan 14, AD 30 or 33; composed c. AD 85-95
- **Narrative context:** the **Paraclete-promise unit** of the Upper Room Discourse. Jesus has just told the disciples that the world will hate them as it hated Him (vv. 18-25). The hostility-prediction is followed immediately by the **Paraclete-promise**, the Father will send the Spirit of truth, who will *bear witness of me* (v. 26). The disciples are not left alone to face the world's hostility; the Spirit-Paraclete will be the divine-witness-empowering presence. The verse contains four theologically loaded claims about the Spirit: (a) the Comforter / Paraclete (*paraklētos*) is *sent*; (b) Jesus is the *sender* (*whom I will send*); (c) the sending is *from the Father* (*para tou patros*); (d) the Spirit *proceeds* (*ekporeuetai*) *from the Father*. The verse becomes the central NT text for the medieval *filioque* controversy between Eastern Orthodox and Western Christian traditions.

## Theological reading

John 15:26 is **the principal NT text on the procession of the Holy Spirit**, the procession-from-the-Father (*ekporeuetai para tou patros*) being the foundational claim, and the *whom I will send* being the disputed Christological-co-sending claim. The verse anchors the Trinitarian doctrine of the Spirit's eternal procession AND the controversies that resulted from it (the *filioque* East-West split). The Spirit is identified as:
1. *Paraklētos*, Paraclete, Comforter, Counselor, Advocate (the title Jesus uses of Himself in 1 John 2:1, and now of the Spirit who comes in His name)
2. *To pneuma tēs alētheias*, the Spirit of truth (linking the Spirit to the *truth* aspect of God's being, contrasting with the *spirit of error* of 1 John 4:6)
3. *Sent by Christ*, Christ is the active-sender
4. *Proceeding from the Father*, eternal procession from the Father

### The *Paraklētos*, the multi-aspect Spirit-title

The Greek *paraklētos* (παράκλητος), from *para-kaleō* ("called alongside"), admits multiple translations:
- **Comforter** (KJV / ASV), emphasizes consolation amid suffering
- **Counselor** (WEB / RSV), emphasizes guidance in decision-making
- **Advocate** (NIV / NRSV occasionally), emphasizes legal-courtroom representation
- **Helper** (NASB / ESV), emphasizes practical assistance

The Greek embraces all four meanings. The Spirit is the *called-alongside* Person who comforts, counsels, advocates, and helps. The same word is applied to Jesus in 1 John 2:1, *"if any man sin, we have an advocate [paraklētos] with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."* Jesus and the Spirit are both *paraklētoi*, Jesus interceding for us at the Father's right hand (Heb 7:25), the Spirit interceding within us (Rom 8:26-27).

### The Spirit of truth

The title *to pneuma tēs alētheias*, "the Spirit of truth", appears three times in John's Gospel (14:17; 15:26; 16:13), each in a paraclete-passage. The Spirit's relation to *truth* (*alētheia*) is multifaceted:
- The Spirit guides into all truth (16:13)
- The Spirit teaches the truth Jesus taught (14:26)
- The Spirit testifies about Jesus, who IS the truth (14:6)
- The Spirit produces sanctification through the truth (17:17, *"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth"*)

The Spirit's truth-orientation grounds the Christian doctrine of biblical inspiration: the same Spirit who testified about Christ in the apostolic generation continues to illuminate Scripture for every subsequent generation of believers. See [Inspiration of Scripture](/codex/2-timothy-3-16-17/).

### The procession-from-the-Father, the *filioque* controversy

The Greek verb *ekporeuetai* (ἐκπορεύεται), "proceeds, comes forth", is the key term. The verse asserts the Spirit *proceeds from the Father*. The question of subsequent church history: does the Spirit also *proceed from the Son*?

**The Eastern Orthodox position:** the Spirit proceeds *from the Father alone* (Greek: *ek tou patros monou ekporeuomenon*). The original Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD) read *"the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father."* The Eastern Orthodox tradition maintains this original wording.

**The Western (Roman Catholic / Protestant) position:** the Spirit proceeds *from the Father and the Son* (Latin: *qui ex Patre Filioque procedit*, "who proceeds from the Father AND from the Son"). The Western Church added the *filioque* clause to the Creed at the Third Council of Toledo (589 AD) and made it normative for the Western Church. The clause became a major dispute leading to the Great Schism of 1054 AD.

**The arguments:**
- **Eastern Orthodox**: John 15:26 explicitly says the Spirit proceeds *from the Father*, no *filioque* addition is biblically warranted. Adding *filioque* unilaterally alters an ecumenically-agreed-upon creed. Theologically, the Father is the *sole source* (*archē*) in the Trinity; adding *filioque* compromises the Father's unique source-role.
- **Western Catholic and Protestant**: the Spirit is also the Spirit of Christ (Rom 8:9; Phil 1:19), is sent by Christ (John 15:26's *"whom I will send unto you"*; John 16:7), receives from Christ (John 16:14, *"He shall take of mine"*). Theologically, the *filioque* preserves the homoousios, if the Spirit is fully consubstantial with both Father and Son, the procession must be from both.

The verse itself supports both readings: *"from the Father"* (Eastern emphasis) AND *"whom I will send"* (Western emphasis, Christological co-sending). The dispute is not whether the verse is significant but how to read its dual claim.

### Patristic and Reformed reading

**Athanasius** (*Letters to Serapion* 1, c. AD 359-360): the Spirit's procession from the Father establishes the Spirit's full divinity. The Spirit shares the divine essence with the Father; the procession is eternal, not temporal.

**Augustine** (*On the Trinity* 15.26-27, c. AD 416): the *filioque* doctrine is essentially Augustinian. The Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son as the bond of love between them. Augustine reads John 15:26 in combination with John 16:7 (Christ sending the Spirit) and John 20:22 (Christ breathing the Spirit on the disciples) to establish the co-procession.

**Photius of Constantinople** (9th c., Eastern Orthodox patriarch): the *filioque* is a serious theological error. The Father alone is the source within the Trinity; the Spirit proceeds *from the Father through the Son* (per the Cappadocian formula) but not *from the Father AND the Son*.

**John Calvin** (*Institutes* 1.13.18-19): the Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son. Calvin defends the Western *filioque* position as theologically necessary to preserve the Spirit's full Christological-bondedness.

### The witness function, *martyrēsei peri emou*

The Spirit's role is to *bear witness of Me* (Christ). The verb *martyrēsei* (future of *martyreō*) is the same root as *martys* (witness / martyr). The Spirit's testimony works in two directions:

1. **The Spirit testifies about Christ TO the disciples**, enabling them to understand Christ's identity and work. This is the inward Spirit-illumination of believers.

2. **The Spirit testifies about Christ THROUGH the disciples**, empowering them to witness publicly to the world. Cf. Acts 1:8, *"ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me."*

The pairing in v. 27, *"and ye also bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning"*, establishes the human-divine cooperation in mission. The apostles' eyewitness testimony plus the Spirit's empowering presence constitute the apostolic-mission pattern that has continued through church history.

### Apologetic and Trinitarian deployment

The verse is foundational for:

1. **The full personhood of the Holy Spirit.** The Spirit *will come*, *will testify*, *proceeds*, all active personal verbs. The Spirit is not an impersonal force or attribute; the Spirit is a personal agent who acts.

2. **The Spirit's eternal divinity.** The procession-from-the-Father is eternal, not temporal. The Spirit is not a created being who began to exist; the Spirit eternally proceeds.

3. **The Trinitarian distinction-of-Persons.** The verse contains explicit reference to three: Father (the source), Son (the sender), Spirit (the sent / proceeding). The Three are distinguishable in their personal roles within the divine economy.

4. **The Spirit's Christ-centeredness.** The Spirit's testimony is about Christ. Any "spiritual experience" that draws attention away from Christ is, by this criterion, not the work of the true Holy Spirit. The Spirit always glorifies Christ (cf. John 16:14).

### Defeat of Modalism

The verse is a principal text against Modalism (the heresy that Father, Son, and Spirit are merely three modes of the one God appearing successively). The simultaneous active distinction, the Father sending, the Son sending, the Spirit proceeding, requires distinguishable Persons acting concurrently. Modalism cannot account for the simultaneity.

### Oneness Pentecostal reading

The Oneness reader takes John 15:26 as displaying the one God's three relational modes operating in the divine economy: the Father-source from whom the Spirit proceeds, the Son-manifestation through whom the Spirit comes, the Spirit-presence as the active dynamic of the one God in the church. The Oneness framework does not deny the distinguishable roles; it analyzes them as modes of the one God rather than as three persons. See [Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism](/codex/trinity-vs-oneness-vs-modalism-vs-arianism/).

The Trinitarian reading takes the three actors as three eternally-distinct Persons sharing the one divine nature. Both readings affirm the full divinity of each (Father, Son, Spirit); they differ on the metaphysical analysis.

### Canonical-theological connections

- **John 14:16-17**, first Paraclete-promise (*"another Comforter... the Spirit of truth"*)
- **John 14:26**, second Paraclete-promise (Spirit's teaching role)
- **John 16:7-15**, fourth Paraclete-passage (Spirit's coming, convicting, guiding-into-truth)
- **John 20:22**, Jesus breathing the Spirit on the disciples post-resurrection
- **Acts 1:8**, Spirit's empowering for witness
- **Acts 2:1-4**, Pentecost, Spirit's coming
- **Romans 8:9-11**, Spirit of God / Spirit of Christ identity
- **Romans 8:26-27**, Spirit's intercession
- **Galatians 4:6**, *"God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts"*
- **Matthew 28:19**, Trinitarian baptismal formula (rich hub: [Matthew 3.16-17](/codex/matthew-3-16-17/) companion)
- **1 John 5:6-8**, the Spirit's witness about Jesus

## Key words

- [G0225 - aletheia](/codex/g0225-aletheia/), *aletheia* (Strong's G225). Also appears in: [Mark 12](/codex/mark-12/), [Luke 22.54-62](/codex/luke-22-54-62/), [John 1.14](/codex/john-1-14/).
- [G3875 - parakletos](/codex/g3875-parakletos/), *parakletos* (Strong's G3875). Also appears in: [John 14.16](/codex/john-14-16/), [John 14.26](/codex/john-14-26/), [John 16.7](/codex/john-16-7/).
- [G3962 - pater](/codex/g3962-pater/), *pater* (Strong's G3962). Also appears in: [Matthew 5.48](/codex/matthew-5-48/), [Matthew 6.25-26](/codex/matthew-6-25-26/), [Matthew 6.25-34](/codex/matthew-6-25-34/).
- [G4151 - pneuma](/codex/g4151-pneuma/), *pneuma* (Strong's G4151). Also appears in: [Matthew 1.18](/codex/matthew-1-18/), [Matthew 1.20](/codex/matthew-1-20/), [Matthew 3.16](/codex/matthew-3-16/).

## See also

- [John 16.7](/codex/john-16-7/), companion Paraclete-coming text (rich hub; sibling promotion)
- [John 14.23](/codex/john-14-23/), Father-Son indwelling of the believer (rich hub)
- [Matthew 3.16-17](/codex/matthew-3-16-17/), Trinitarian baptism theophany (rich hub)
- [Holy Spirit](/codex/g4151-pneuma/), domain hub
- [Pneumatology](/codex/pneumatology/), domain hub
- [Trinity](/codex/trinity/) / [Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism](/codex/trinity-vs-oneness-vs-modalism-vs-arianism/), multi-position
- [Filioque](/codex/filioque/), historical doctrinal dispute
- [Eastern Orthodox](/codex/eastern-orthodox/), vs. Western traditions on the procession
- [Pentecost](/codex/acts-2/), historical fulfillment
- [Inspiration of Scripture](/codex/2-timothy-3-16-17/), adjacent doctrine
- [Jesus](/codex/jesus/), speaker
- [Council of Constantinople I](/codex/council-of-constantinople-i/), 381 AD original Creed-formulation

<!-- BACKLINKS:START -->
## Quoted in

**Arguments and defeaters:**

- [Did Jesus Send Muhammad Dilemma Argument](/codex/did-jesus-send-muhammad-dilemma-argument/)
- [Muhammad as Paraclete Refutation](/codex/muhammad-as-paraclete-refutation/)
- [Quran Confirms the Trinity Argument](/codex/quran-confirms-the-trinity-argument/)
- [Trinity Coherence Defense (Latin-Thomist)](/codex/trinity-coherence-defense-latin-thomist/)

**Concepts:**

- [Christianity](/codex/christianity/)
- [Christs Deity](/codex/christs-deity/)
- [Council of Constantinople I](/codex/council-of-constantinople-i/)
- [Filioque](/codex/filioque/)
- [Jesus Said](/codex/jesus-said/), via [John 15.1-27](/codex/john-15-1-27/)
- [Modalism](/codex/modalism/)
- [Paraclete, Identity and Recipients](/codex/paraclete-identity-and-recipients/)
- [Pneumatology](/codex/pneumatology/)
- [Trinity vs Oneness vs Modalism vs Arianism](/codex/trinity-vs-oneness-vs-modalism-vs-arianism/)

**Lexicon:**

- [G0225 - aletheia](/codex/g0225-aletheia/)
- [G3875 - parakletos](/codex/g3875-parakletos/)
- [G4151 - pneuma](/codex/g4151-pneuma/)

**Passages:**

- [1 John 2.1](/codex/1-john-2-1/)
- [1 John 5.7](/codex/1-john-5-7/)
- [John 14.16](/codex/john-14-16/)
- [John 14.17](/codex/john-14-17/)
- [John 16.5-15](/codex/john-16-5-15/)
- [John 16.7](/codex/john-16-7/)

<!-- BACKLINKS:END -->
